Sorry, surely I've not sent it ? anyway, continuing..
On 28 November 2012 09:28, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> On 27 November 2012 23:56, Mat M wrote:
>>> It's the other way around, they will be downloaded even if we don't
>>> necessarily need them.
>>> See BUILD_TYPE="$BUILD_TYPE MOZ" above in configure
On 27 November 2012 23:56, Mat M wrote:
>> It's the other way around, they will be downloaded even if we don't
>> necessarily need them.
>> See BUILD_TYPE="$BUILD_TYPE MOZ" above in configure.
>> If PREBUILD_MOZAB == YES then also MOZ is in BUILD_TYPE.
>
>
> So it is a regression from before where
Hello,
that's me again.
Le Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:44:08 +0100, Matúš Kukan a
écrit:
On 27 November 2012 02:18, Mat M wrote:
Ah. yes, but without setting the BUILDTYPE with a pattern that matches
the
tar name, how do you trigger the download ?
* the pattern is not important, we don't do
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:01:59PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Matúš Kukan píše v Út 27. 11. 2012 v 13:34 +0100:
> > On 26 November 2012 11:46, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > It was me who come up with the idea or removing md5sum from the file
> > > name. Well, it was after Matus came up with the i
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> Or we want to make sure that people use the only single version of the
> tarballs (security?, preciseness?). In this case, we might need md5sum
> in git. But this is pretty non-standart solution. I think that it is too
> paranoid and I am not
Matúš Kukan píše v Út 27. 11. 2012 v 13:34 +0100:
> On 26 November 2012 11:46, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > It was me who come up with the idea or removing md5sum from the file
> > name. Well, it was after Matus came up with the idea of introducing .md5
> > files :-)
>
> Wasn't it David who came up wit
On 26 November 2012 11:46, Petr Mladek wrote:
> It was me who come up with the idea or removing md5sum from the file
> name. Well, it was after Matus came up with the idea of introducing .md5
> files :-)
Wasn't it David who came up with .md5 files ?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56
On 27 November 2012 02:18, Mat M wrote:
> Ah. yes, but without setting the BUILDTYPE with a pattern that matches the
> tar name, how do you trigger the download ?
* the pattern is not important, we don't do any magic and use it
always explicitly, so:
GRAPHITE:graphite in prj/build.lst or
$(call f
Matus,
Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:32:51 +0100, Matúš Kukan a
écrit:
You could have.. I just wanted to let people know here what I am
working on to be sure nobody will be strongly against (maybe it was
pointless)
The more the better :-)
- Add a block to test for the need of the tarball in co
Hello Mat
On 23 November 2012 19:06, Mat M wrote:
> Hello Matus,
>
> I plannned to answer in the issue, but I saw your comment about the ML,so...
You could have.. I just wanted to let people know here what I am
working on to be sure nobody will be strongly against (maybe it was
pointless)
I thin
Mat M píše v Pá 23. 11. 2012 v 19:06 +0100:
> Alternative: if someone insists on separating md5 from filename to be able
> to use default tars,
It was me who come up with the idea or removing md5sum from the file
name. Well, it was after Matus came up with the idea of introducing .md5
files :-)
Hello Matus,
I plannned to answer in the issue, but I saw your comment about the
ML,so...
Le Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:19:52 +0100, Matúš Kukan a
écrit:
Hi,
I've made some changes around 'make fetch', ./download, ./ooo.lst in
feature/download.
Files are downloaded by makefile now and it is sup
Hi,
I've made some changes around 'make fetch', ./download, ./ooo.lst in
feature/download.
Files are downloaded by makefile now and it is supposed to work better.
There are still few issues though and I am not sure whether to work on
them or it's going to be thrown away because it's ugly.
So, any
13 matches
Mail list logo
