Re: min version of gtk3

2017-12-04 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 13:31 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 14:25 +0100, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote: > > You want to drop Gtk+ < 3.20.0 support in or after 6.0? > > For me I was thinking for > 6.0, scarabeus (for suse) was wondering > additionally about 6.0 I've bumped the mi

Re: min version of gtk3

2017-12-01 Thread Caolán McNamara
be a lot simpler if the min version of gtk3 was > > 3.20.0, is there any distributions or individual devs for whom that > > would cause a problem ? > > Ubuntu Xenial (16.04) has 3.18.9-1ubuntu3, which I backported for our > trusty master tinderbox. > > I guess we won'

Re: min version of gtk3

2017-12-01 Thread Jan-Marek Glogowski
Am 01.12.2017 um 13:43 schrieb Caolán McNamara: > There was a theming change in gtk3 3.20.0 and we support the old scheme > before that point and the new scheme after that point. > > Things would be a lot simpler if the min version of gtk3 was 3.20.0, is > there any distribution

min version of gtk3

2017-12-01 Thread Caolán McNamara
There was a theming change in gtk3 3.20.0 and we support the old scheme before that point and the new scheme after that point. Things would be a lot simpler if the min version of gtk3 was 3.20.0, is there any distributions or individual devs for whom that would cause a problem