Hi Terry,
On 08/02/2023 20.05, Terrence Enger wrote:
I am trying to follow the instructions at
"Development/BuildingForAndroid"
<https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/BuildingForAndroid>;.
The step `make install` failed with messages (lines rewrapped).
* Where:
Greetings,
I am trying to follow the instructions at
"Development/BuildingForAndroid"
<https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/BuildingForAndroid>;.
The step `make install` failed with messages (lines rewrapped).
* Where:
Build file
'/home/terry/l
On 06/09/17 19:45, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Wednesday, 2017-09-06 16:26:09 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
>
>> apparently you are trying to use "make install", which probably is
>> unused and unmaintained; maybe we should remove it.
>
> make i
Hi Michael,
On Wednesday, 2017-09-06 16:26:09 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> apparently you are trying to use "make install", which probably is
> unused and unmaintained; maybe we should remove it.
make install works fine if one configures with --prefix=..., I use it
re
Excuse my ignorance :(
Thanks you, I have try.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Error-while-make-install-Android-Viewer-tp4196992p4213282.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
>
> Various low-level dependencies are missing, please install them:
> aclocal: aclocal is required
> pkg-config: pkg-config is required to be installed
> autoconf: autoconf is required
>
Isn't that a very clear error message?
In order to build the Android Viewer, you n
?
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Error-while-make-install-Android-Viewer-tp4196992p4213278.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https
> Can't find autogen.sh on PATH, '.' not in PATH.
>
Run: ./autogen.sh
This is not specific to LibreOffice in any way but normal Unix behaviour.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/l
nd the notice in the file
Thanks you and excuse me for my bad english
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Error-while-make-install-Android-Viewer-tp4196992p4213275.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list a
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Rosen Silva wrote:
> Hi, I was trying to install freshly build LibreOffice Android Viewer using
> "make install" command using Makefile which was located at
> "core/android/source" , but suddenly it shows that a file is missing.
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:33:59PM +0600, Rosen Silva wrote:
> The file name was "n/core/android/source/liboSettings.gradle"
> then I searched the core in github weather is it available
> but there is no such file. Can anyone give me a solution ?
> ,Anyway I feels like that file should gene
Hi,
I was trying to install freshly build LibreOffice Android Viewer using "make
install" command using Makefile
which was located at "core/android/source" , but suddenly it shows that a file
is missing. The file name was
"n/core/android/source/liboSettings.gradle&quo
Hi,
I was trying to install freshly build LibreOffice Android Viewer using
"make install" command using Makefile which was located at
"core/android/source" , but suddenly it shows that a file is missing.
The file name was "n/core/android/source/liboSettings.gradle&quo
Hi All
how to make LibreOffice install package for windows
--
Best Regards,
*CSEC*
Computer Science Egyptian Center
Soliman ElDebaky
Software Developer
* *
Mob: (+2) 01007294366
Website : www.csec1.com
Email : soliman.mou...@gmail.com
Le 21/06/2013 10:09, Matúš Kukan a écrit :
Hi Matúš,
or this could also help:
make desktop.clean && make desktop && make dev-install -o build
That did it for me, thanks :-))
Alex
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
ht
On 21 June 2013 09:43, Alex Thurgood wrote:
> /home/Development/libo/core/solver/unxlngi6.pro/installation/opt/program/soffice.bin:
> /usr/lib/libuno_sal.so.3: version `LIBO_UDK_4.1' not found (required by
> /home/Development/libo/core/solver/unxlngi6.pro/installation/opt/program/../ure-link/lib/l
Le 20/06/2013 16:40, Miklos Vajna a écrit :
Hi Miklos,
Is this a clean build? Even after the fix arrived, an incremental build
will have the same problem. No need to mess with the --with-help or
--without-help switches, I hope. At least I did not. :-)
The problem was the use of --with-sun-te
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:35:38PM +0200, Alexander Thurgood
wrote:
> I couldn't say which commit is responsible, but it is still not
> building for me with make dev-install. Gets to near the end, and
> then fails with missing modules, even if I explicitly add the
> --with-help switch as Caolan s
Le 12/06/2013 12:18, Miklos Vajna a écrit :
Hi Miklos,
What commit, exactly? dev-install was broken in the morning, but it's
already fixed.
I couldn't say which commit is responsible, but it is still not building
for me with make dev-install. Gets to near the end, and then fails with
missi
If not, then it might be a
little bug in the make install logic somewhere that it assumes that help
has been built. You could workaround that with ./configure --with-help
which will pull down the help submodule and presumably then that'll
build and be available to keep make install happy.
FW
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:32:27AM +0200, Alexander Thurgood
wrote:
> FWIW, on my 32bit Linux Ubuntu 12.10 box, make dev-install fails too, I
> just hadn't had the time recently to report it.
What commit, exactly? dev-install was broken in the morning, but it's
already fixed.
signature.asc
Des
Le 11/06/13 11:18, Caolán McNamara a écrit :
Hi all,
> So, does "make dev-install" work ? That might be what you really want
> anyway if you want to hack on libreoffice. If not, then it might be a
> little bug in the make install logic somewhere that it assumes that help
&g
Thank you András,
I will check it tomorrow.
Cheers,
Kami
2012/6/14, Andras Timar :
> 2012/6/14 KAMI911 KAMI911 :
>> Hi!
>>
>> Can you help me how can I redefine:
>>
>> # Identity of this package.
>> PACKAGE_NAME='LibreOffice'
>> PACKAGE_TARNAME='libreoffice'
>> PACKAGE_VERSION='3.6'
>> PACKAGE_S
2012/6/14 KAMI911 KAMI911 :
> Hi!
>
> Can you help me how can I redefine:
>
> # Identity of this package.
> PACKAGE_NAME='LibreOffice'
> PACKAGE_TARNAME='libreoffice'
> PACKAGE_VERSION='3.6'
> PACKAGE_STRING='LibreOffice 3.6'
> PACKAGE_BUGREPORT=''
> PACKAGE_URL='http://documentfoundation.org/'
>
>
Hi!
Can you help me how can I redefine:
# Identity of this package.
PACKAGE_NAME='LibreOffice'
PACKAGE_TARNAME='libreoffice'
PACKAGE_VERSION='3.6'
PACKAGE_STRING='LibreOffice 3.6'
PACKAGE_BUGREPORT=''
PACKAGE_URL='http://documentfoundation.org/'
values? What is the source of these variables?
Are
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 21:45 +, ORTIZ MARTINEZ JOSE ASUNCION wrote:
> Thanks for your help.
Please always CC: the developers list - I can't handle every thread on
my own ie. dig out "reply-to-all" in your mail client please :-)
> I would like to change the default name ...
O
Hi Ortiz,
[ Putting back the list to CC. ]
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:45:36PM +, ORTIZ MARTINEZ JOSE ASUNCION
wrote:
> Thanks for your help.
>
> I use the install from the instsetoo_native directory and
>
> The install was ok...
>
>
> I have a last question.
>
> I would like to ch
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:56:28PM +0100, Michael Meeks
wrote:
> for some help unwinding that :-) [ a quick patch to special case the
> Windows build and print something more helpful / hide the dev-install
> thing would be great BTW ].
Commit 5293f5035b24ea47490008aa849b4c5fb0d28a10 hopefu
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 09:28 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> > To install, issue: make install
> > Developers might prefer this way: make dev-install -o build
>
> Sorry, that's misleading on Windows. On that platform, the plain 'make'
> generates the MSI you can
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 08:15:37PM +, ORTIZ MARTINEZ JOSE ASUNCION
wrote:
> LibreOffice build succesfully finished.
>
> To install, issue: make install
> Developers might prefer this way: make dev-install -o build
Sorry, that's misleading on Windows. On that platform
c/software/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.1
--with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/anth
--without-junit
--disable-atl
--disable-activex
--with-csc-path=/cygdrive/c/csc
)
The last message was :
: : :
LibreOffice build succesfully finished.
To install, issue: make install
Developers mi
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 15:34 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Caolán McNamara wrote (22-11-11 15:25)
>
> >> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> >> 0xb309b4f3 in X11SalGraphics::GetResolution(long&, long&) ()
> >
> > Hmm, pity it isn't an --enable-symbols build which would give line
> >
Caolán McNamara wrote (22-11-11 15:25)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb309b4f3 in X11SalGraphics::GetResolution(long&, long&) ()
Hmm, pity it isn't an --enable-symbols build which would give line
numbers.
I could build like that. But won't be soon, prolly.
Do I just h
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 13:41 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Caolán McNamara wrote (22-11-11 13:32)
>
> > lets get a backtrace there, i.e.
> >
> > . ./ooenv
> > gdb --args ./soffice.bin
> > (gdb) run
> > (gdb) bt
>
> Starting program:
> /home/cono/src/git/libo_core/solver/unxlngi6.pro/installation/opt/
Caolán McNamara wrote (22-11-11 13:32)
lets get a backtrace there, i.e.
. ./ooenv
gdb --args ./soffice.bin
(gdb) run
(gdb) bt
Starting program:
/home/cono/src/git/libo_core/solver/unxlngi6.pro/installation/opt/program/soffice.bin
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 13:22 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Stephan Bergmann wrote (22-11-11 09:23)
>
> > You have a computer terminal in your bathroom? What a nerd you are. ;)
>
> Well, close to. But I resist giving more detials ;-)
>
> > Anyway, confusing install vs. dev-install looks like a plausib
Stephan Bergmann wrote (22-11-11 09:23)
You have a computer terminal in your bathroom? What a nerd you are. ;)
Well, close to. But I resist giving more detials ;-)
Anyway, confusing install vs. dev-install looks like a plausible
explanation.
make dev-install ran fine.
But alas the program
On 11/22/2011 09:16 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hmm, I just looked again. And it looks as if I was confused and should
have run 'make dev-install' ( Was late, basically I was in the bathroom
rather then on the office ;-) )
You have a computer terminal in your bathroom? What a nerd you are. ;)
Anywa
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Bergmann wrote (22-11-11 08:54)
Do you need to tell "make install" where to install it to (looks like it
uses /usr/local/lib as default prefix, maybe we accept a --prefix
configure switch?).
Hmm, I just looked again. And it looks as if I was confused and should
On 11/22/2011 07:06 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
after the make, make install runs fine for some time but finishes with
these last lines:
"
Entering /home/cono/src/git/libo_core/instsetoo_native/util
dmake: makefile.mk: line 239: Warning: -- Prior to dmake 4.5 only one
%-target per target-defin
Cor Nouws wrote (22-11-11 07:06)
And indeed, I cannot start the programm in the following way, that I was
able before:
"
cd /home/cono/src/git/libo_core/install/program
. ./ooenv
./soffice.bin
"
something wrong in make install or new methodology?
Of course this info:
cono@cono-tm
after the make, make install runs fine for some time but finishes with
these last lines:
"
Entering /home/cono/src/git/libo_core/instsetoo_native/util
dmake: makefile.mk: line 239: Warning: -- Prior to dmake 4.5 only one
%-target per target-definition worked reliably. Check your make
Hi Karl,
2011/9/1 Karl Behler (IPP) :
>> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
>> ERROR: File not found: dict-de-AT.oxt
>> ERROR: File not found: dict-de-CH.oxt
>> ERROR: File not found: dict-de-DE.oxt
Today I merged the 3 German dictionary packs into 1. A git pull should
solve your prob
Hi all,
I finally managed to build libreoffice (git downloaded from yesterday)
on my OpenSuse 11.4. But while everything went fine the final
"make install" fails with following output:
libreoffice/core> sudo make install
Installing in /usr/local...
Running LibreOffice install
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 06:28 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> Hello Anurag, Kohei
>
> sadly it seems that the installation has not finished when the
> smoketest runs. I have a similar problem that a unit test in
> smoketest_native fails and as a result I have no working installation.
> I have soffic
Hello Anurag, Kohei
sadly it seems that the installation has not finished when the smoketest
runs. I have a similar problem that a unit test in smoketest_native fails
and as a result I have no working installation. I have soffice. bin but when
I try to start it crashes after some seconds.
I think
Hello Anurag,
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 06:30 +0530, Anurag Jain wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I guess after a lot of changes LO build system, make install fails
> for me. Here is the output http://pastebin.com/nNNyiV86 .
So, I remember we had this discussion on IRC, and Tor gave you the
Hello there,
I guess after a lot of changes LO build system, make install fails
for me. Here is the output http://pastebin.com/nNNyiV86 .
Also previously for me while doing a make here used to be 163 module
(i.e. smoketestoo_native was not executed) and I was able to install
it using
make dev
erting a change can only be a temporary solution. But it doesn't
work for me. With --libdir=/usr/LIBDIR it fails for me:
make DESTDIR=${pkgdir} install
==> Entering fakeroot environment...
==> Starting package_libreoffice()...
Installing in /usr/LIBDIR/libreoffice...
mkdir /usr/LIBDI
49 matches
Mail list logo
