Hi Matus,
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:11:31PM +0200, Matúš Kukan
wrote:
> and found one huge performance regression (21 -> 102 bn pseudo cycles),
> for a .doc document [2] between commits
> 947feaa896168430c78dd08dabee1447133f2740..8dd624128bf12e013c17b3b24c0b24135296bb8e
> so I suspect it has so
Hi Matus,
> Btw, loperf already helped me once to notice regression caused by my commit
> [3], fixed later [4], so it's quite useful I'd say.
> Do you think it makes sense to let you know if I notice any regressions as in
> this e-mail?
> Presumably yes, hopefully people are interested in fixin
Hi there,
I was checking loperf results [1]
and found one huge performance regression (21 -> 102 bn pseudo cycles),
for a .doc document [2] between commits
947feaa896168430c78dd08dabee1447133f2740..8dd624128bf12e013c17b3b24c0b24135296bb8e
so I suspect it has something to do with SwTextBoxHelper.
C
