Re: [REVIEW-3-5][REVIEW-3-5-1] libxml2 on MacOSX

2012-03-01 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 02/23/2012 09:48 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: shows that only a handful of executables and dynamic libraries use system libxml (/usr/lib/libxml2.2.dylib or /usr/local/lib/libxml2.2.dylib)---all of which are apparently only used during the build (if at all) and not included in the installation s

Re: [PUSHED-3-5][PUSHED-3-5-1] libxml2 on MacOSX

2012-02-28 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 02/24/2012 05:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: I've cherry-picked these to the 3-5 branch. tinderbox is happy Seen pushed into both libreoffice-3-5 and libreoffice-3-5-1, marking thread accordingly. Stephan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice

Re: [REVIEW-3-5][REVIEW-3-5-1] libxml2 on MacOSX

2012-02-23 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 02/22/2012 11:54 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> as a follow-up to >> it was necessary to use libxml2 as an internal library for MacOSX... >> which was not well supported. >> >> >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?

Re: [REVIEW-3-5][REVIEW-3-5-1] libxml2 on MacOSX

2012-02-23 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 02/22/2012 11:54 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: as a follow-up to it was necessary to use libxml2 as an internal library for MacOSX... which was not well supported. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=49843f0f9788e01805d8d0d27428fe5e6a4cc530 is what I had to do to get it to

libxml2 on MacOSX

2012-02-22 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
as a follow-up to it was necessary to use libxml2 as an internal library for MacOSX... which was not well supported. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=49843f0f9788e01805d8d0d27428fe5e6a4cc530 is what I had to do to get it to build. that included a change of 'layer' for libxm