Re: libmerged and related thoughts

2012-02-21 Thread Matúš Kukan
On 20 February 2012 14:40, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 00:31 +0100, Matúš Kukan wrote: >> It fails in testtools/source/bridgetest/ > > And removing the unxlng* in testtools are forcing a rebuild there > doesn't help ?, i.e. this might be an unrelated thing with a partial > rebui

Re: libmerged and related thoughts

2012-02-20 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 00:31 +0100, Matúš Kukan wrote: > It fails in testtools/source/bridgetest/ And removing the unxlng* in testtools are forcing a rebuild there doesn't help ?, i.e. this might be an unrelated thing with a partial rebuild with missing dependency information in the old dmake-based

libmerged and related thoughts

2012-02-19 Thread Matúš Kukan
Hi Michael, Tor On 17 February 2012 18:36, Michael Meeks wrote: >        Well, I'm building and running with it myself on Linux; so far it seems > that libmergedlo.so is only 5.1Mb - which surprises me, since my libsvx* > are both rather huge. It has ~28 MB for me now. >        As/when we have