On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 08:37:55PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 15:13 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Well, you did, but apparently we didn't catch up on it and now we are
>> about to ship 5.0.4 with a significant regression compared to 5.0.3
>> :-(
>> See https://bug
On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 15:13 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Well, you did, but apparently we didn't catch up on it and now we are
> about to ship 5.0.4 with a significant regression compared to 5.0.3
> :-(
>
> See https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/96482
>
> Do you think you can take a look a
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:59:27PM +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 14/12/2015 16:56, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit :
>> Regression is there. We are about to release 5.0.4.2 as final with
>> that regression.
> Looked at tdf#94069 and tested on master 5.2 alpha - I get no crash when
> moving the
Le 14/12/2015 16:56, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit :
Hi all,
> Regression is there. We are about to release 5.0.4.2 as final with
> that regression.
>
Looked at tdf#94069 and tested on master 5.2 alpha - I get no crash when
moving the grid control around in a form in form design mode.
What is/was
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 07:13:43AM -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
> On 12/14/2015 06:46 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Was Caolan's commit, you said you would test "not before this weekend"
>> (a month ago), and to please poke you again "by Sunday" but nobody
>> poked you. (The poke fell through the
On 12/14/2015 06:46 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Was Caolan's commit, you said you would test "not before this weekend"
> (a month ago), and to please poke you again "by Sunday" but nobody
> poked you. (The poke fell through the list of things *I* have to do.)
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:37:36AM -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
> On 12/14/2015 06:13 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Do you think you can take a look at it "fast" or should we revert?
> I don't remember why/how I was involved with this? Did I say I would
> test it and somehow it fell through the li
On 12/14/2015 06:13 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Do you think you can take a look at it "fast" or should we revert?
I don't remember why/how I was involved with this? Did I say I would
test it and somehow it fell through the list of things that I have to
do? What should I "look at"? Was it my
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:59:46AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 11:31 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> There is patch attached to tdf#94069, nominally a rather annoying
>> Base UI bug (crash!), but which touches the VCL event loop (not
>> specific to Base) in a way that
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 11:31 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is patch attached to tdf#94069, nominally a rather annoying
> Base UI bug (crash!), but which touches the VCL event loop (not
> specific to Base) in a way that I don't understand the consequences
> of
If I look at the
Hi,
There is patch attached to tdf#94069, nominally a rather annoying Base
UI bug (crash!), but which touches the VCL event loop (not specific to
Base) in a way that I don't understand the consequences of (treat 10
events per call instead of 1...).
Would the right fix rather be to arrange for bHa
11 matches
Mail list logo
