Il 11/03/2013 23:52, David Ostrovsky ha scritto:
The result - now it fits on A3:
http://ostrovsky.org/libo/lo.png
Much more readable thanks! Quote readable even on printed A4, font is a
bit fuzzy but indeed useful. Thanks!
riccardo
___
LibreOffice
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 23:52 +0100, David Ostrovsky wrote:
> May be i am missing a point why do you prefer the library graph...
> anyway added the option:
It looked simpler somehow :-) seeing your updated version, I don't
think it's critical now but may be useful :-)
> Fixed now:
On Mon Mar 11 Michael Meeks wrote:
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 23:39 +0100, David Ostrovsky wrote:
/ http://ostrovsky.org/libo/lo.png
/>>/ http://ostrovsky.org/libo/lo.graphviz
/
Nice - then again, it looks a little different ( I rather preferred the
library graph - it seemed simpler - can
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 23:39 +0100, David Ostrovsky wrote:
> You are a funny one ;-)
> First you are starting that project on write only language and then
> looking for a mantainer??? ;-)
Hah ;-) seems you defeated the write-only language at the first attempt
however; nice work.
> so we
Hi Michael,
On 06.03.2013 11:40, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi David,
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 08:08 +0100, David Ostrovsky wrote:
(a) you named it module-deps, but it is library-deps for now.
True of course; feel free to rename it to your taste :-) it sounds like
the tool has a new maintainer in it's
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 10:34 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Tuesday, 2013-03-05 18:36:48 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> > http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/module-deps.png
> > http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/module-deps.graphviz
>
> So that's how it might look l
On 03/06/2013 08:08 AM, David Ostrovsky wrote:
(b) some subtle differencies to hand made dmake build module dependency
list:
Compared to the dmake build module dependency list it seems not to say
the whole truth:
cat svx/prj/build.lst
sx svx : sfx2 oovbaapi DBCONNECTIVITY:connecti
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 10:34 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2013-03-05 18:36:48 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/module-deps.png
> > http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/module-deps.graphviz
>
> So that's how it might look like, I always wonde
Hi David,
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 08:08 +0100, David Ostrovsky wrote:
> On Tue Mar 5 Michael Meeks wrote:
> >I had a quick hack at the:
> >make module-deps
>
> Thank you! After looking into it i thnk, that it needs some tweaks
> before it can be merged ;-)
;-) FWIW - I fixed the hor
Hi Michael,
On Tuesday, 2013-03-05 18:36:48 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/module-deps.png
> http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/module-deps.graphviz
So that's how it might look like, I always wondered ;-)
I suggest we print a final version (I
On Tue Mar 5 Michael Meeks wrote:
>I had a quick hack at the:
>
>make module-deps
Thank you! After looking into it i thnk, that it needs some tweaks
before it can be merged ;-)
(a) you named it module-deps, but it is library-deps for now. Well may
be we want library-deps too, but to be
I had a quick hack at the:
make module-deps
thing - and wrote the world's worst performing algorithm (in perl) to
process it into a graphviz graph.
Most of the time is spent eliding redundant dependencies; by which I
mean if 'foo' depends on 'vcl' and 'sal' - we should e
12 matches
Mail list logo
