Re: fodg + gradient + angle

2012-07-28 Thread Michael Stahl
On 28/07/12 11:21, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Christina :-) > > On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 21:39 +0200, Christina Roßmanith wrote: >> a gradient angle given without a unith should be interpreted as degrees, >> but in my example a value of draw:angle="90" shows up in LibO as 9 >> degrees. If I change i

Re: fodg + gradient + angle

2012-07-28 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Christina :-) On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 21:39 +0200, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > a gradient angle given without a unith should be interpreted as degrees, > but in my example a value of draw:angle="90" shows up in LibO as 9 > degrees. If I change it to draw:angle="90deg" the value is read correct

Re: fodg + gradient + angle

2012-07-28 Thread Fridrich Strba
Don't fix, historic behaviour in odg. Sent from Samsung Mobile Christina Roßmanith wrote: Hi, a gradient angle given without a unith should be interpreted as degrees, but in my example a value of draw:angle="90" shows up in LibO as 9 degrees. If I change it to draw:angle="90deg" the value i

fodg + gradient + angle

2012-07-27 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi, a gradient angle given without a unith should be interpreted as degrees, but in my example a value of draw:angle="90" shows up in LibO as 9 degrees. If I change it to draw:angle="90deg" the value is read correctly. Thus the question is: Where do I have to look to fix it? Thank you for an