Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On 11/23/2012 05:16 PM, Mat M wrote: We have Linux and OSX zips in [1], which are useless since mork is running, IIUC. But they can still be used by builds for older branches, so I would just leave them alone at . Stephan _

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Le Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:19:31 +0100, Stephan Bergmann a écrit: On 11/23/2012 03:36 AM, Mat M wrote: What about MinGW when building this ab driver ? Should I use WNT zips ? With "zips" you mean the prebuilt deliverables from module moz that LO's configure machinery can download from

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On 11/23/2012 03:36 AM, Mat M wrote: What about MinGW when building this ab driver ? Should I use WNT zips ? With "zips" you mean the prebuilt deliverables from module moz that LO's configure machinery can download from (see MOZ_ZIP_* in ooo.lst.in),

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Hello Le Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:46:43 +0100, a écrit: Quoting Mat M : Le Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:33:20 +0100, a écrit: Quoting Stephan Bergmann : Further clean-up of all the Mozilla-related configure switches (--enable-mozilla, --disable-build-mozilla, --with-mozilla-toolkit, --with-system

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Quoting Mat M : Le Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:33:20 +0100, a écrit: Quoting Stephan Bergmann : Further clean-up of all the Mozilla-related configure switches (--enable-mozilla, --disable-build-mozilla, --with-mozilla-toolkit, --with-system-mozilla, --with-mozilla-build) and config_host.mk.in

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

> There's traditionally been little > effort in making any of those --with-system-* switches actually work on > Windows, This is true for "local" MSVC Windows builds, where --with-system for various 3rd-party libraries indeed makes little sense. But in the MinGW cross-compilation case, I think th

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On 11/22/2012 02:49 AM, Mat M wrote: Am going for it. --enable-mozilla now means enable mozilla address book driver on windows --with-mozilla-build will be renamed to --with-nss-build (although nss is coming from mozilla, and then, we still downlaod from mozilla.org :) --with-nss-build is require

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Le Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:33:20 +0100, a écrit: Quoting Stephan Bergmann : Further clean-up of all the Mozilla-related configure switches (--enable-mozilla, --disable-build-mozilla, --with-mozilla-toolkit, --with-system-mozilla, --with-mozilla-build) and config_host.mk.in variables (BUILD

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Quoting Stephan Bergmann : Further clean-up of all the Mozilla-related configure switches (--enable-mozilla, --disable-build-mozilla, --with-mozilla-toolkit, --with-system-mozilla, --with-mozilla-build) and config_host.mk.in variables (BUILD_MOZAB, DEFAULT_MOZILLA_TOOLKIT, MOZILLABUILD,

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On 11/14/2012 08:59 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 11/09/2012 11:50 AM, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: Quoting Stephan Bergmann : On 11/09/2012 08:48 AM, David Ostrovsky wrote: * deprecate moz shipping as it may be needed for some extensions. That why Stephan reverted my patch: "don't compile moz

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On 11/09/2012 11:50 AM, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: Quoting Stephan Bergmann : On 11/09/2012 08:48 AM, David Ostrovsky wrote: * deprecate moz shipping as it may be needed for some extensions. That why Stephan reverted my patch: "don't compile moz module on all non windows platforms" Which com

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Quoting Stephan Bergmann : On 11/09/2012 08:48 AM, David Ostrovsky wrote: * deprecate moz shipping as it may be needed for some extensions. That why Stephan reverted my patch: "don't compile moz module on all non windows platforms" Which commit are you talking about here? this one: 903065dd

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On 11/09/2012 11:19 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 11/09/2012 10:58 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: Did we get the cert. management pieces we need out of Mozilla too ? My understanding is that this is covered by linking against module nss rather than module moz, and by connectivity/Library_mozboo

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On 11/09/2012 10:58 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: Did we get the cert. management pieces we need out of Mozilla too ? My understanding is that this is covered by linking against module nss rather than module moz, and by connectivity/Library_mozbootstrap.mk accessing Mozilla certificate dat

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Hi David, On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 08:48 +0100, David Ostrovsky wrote: > As discussed with Fridrich on LO Congress, i took a look at seamonkey > way to handle it. They simple open MAPI.DLL > and use WAB restriction API to access it. Moreover the algorithms and > the data strucures in mozab (and th

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On 11/09/2012 08:48 AM, David Ostrovsky wrote: * deprecate moz shipping as it may be needed for some extensions. That why Stephan reverted my patch: "don't compile moz module on all non windows platforms" Which commit are you talking about here? Stephan ___

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Am 09.11.2012 07:22, schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane: >>All these solutions would not require a "new" driver, we just generate >>the correct ADO connect URL and hand it off to the ADO driver (as we >>do for .mdb / .accdb files). >>As to accessing Outlook express address book, >>This would require an a

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:08:42PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 11:12 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> All these solutions would not require a "new" driver, we just generate >> the correct ADO connect URL and hand it off to the ADO driver (as we >> do for .mdb / .accdb

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 11:12 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > All these solutions would not require a "new" driver, we just generate > the correct ADO connect URL and hand it off to the ADO driver (as we > do for .mdb / .accdb files). > > > As to accessing Outlook express address book, > > This

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:26:29PM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote: > Am 17.10.2012 13:24, schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane: >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:07:53AM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote: But take into considreation that on windows old mozab driver still used. >> Sorry, I didn't follow this

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Am 17.10.2012 13:24, schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane: On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:07:53AM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote: >But take into considreation that on windows old mozab driver still >used. Sorry, I didn't follow this story closely. Why? Because on windows moz driver is also in charge for acces

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:07:53AM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote: > Am 15.10.2012 09:50, schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane: >>>done:https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/841/ I wasn't sure what would be the best way to differentiate between test and production case, so i abused driver url...

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Am 15.10.2012 09:50, schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane: done:https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/841/ Hey, great! Next time I feel the need to scratch the unit test itch, I'll certainly take "inspiration" from that. Actually it might be easy to create a comlete cpp unit test for a file based database d

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:15:55AM +0200, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: > Quoting Michael Meeks : >> Of course - it would be -lovely- to have a native C++ unit test in >> dbaccess/qa/extras/ that we could use to do a few queries on a sample >> mork file (...) > done: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Hi David, On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 10:15 +0200, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: > Quoting Michael Meeks : > > Of course - it would be -lovely- to have a native C++ unit test in > > dbaccess/qa/extras/ that we could use to do a few queries on a sample > > mork file and add that to our regression test suit

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Hi Michael, Quoting Michael Meeks : Of course - it would be -lovely- to have a native C++ unit test in dbaccess/qa/extras/ that we could use to do a few queries on a sample mork file and add that to our regression test suite :-) having more native-code dbaccess/ tests as a harness others can b

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 12:23 +0200, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: > We have one problem with that approach: other linux distros that are > shipping mozilla mozab driver can experience less features or less > quality with that new implementation. But ... no risk, no fun ;-) That's fine -

Re: fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Hi, some progress here: On 17.09.2012 12:23, david ostrovsky wrote: 1. Change the implementation on feature/mork branch to still depend on mozilla on windows. (Currently mozilla stripped there for all platforms completely). done. Many thanks to David Tardon for helping out with git rebase! 2

fdo#51004: some progress and 10 years old bug pending

Hi, there is some progress with that issue: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51004 Note: the situation on debian/ubuntu is really serious, because they are not shipping "somehow strange hacked mozilla version" at all. You can find some funny comments on that 10 year old bug: http