Hey!
This seems to be a long awaited question i have been having in mind. As Tor
mentioned the name i dont think is a big deal for the header here,but what
i think is i need to understand the thing i asked earlier ,regarding the
matter at Line #148 . So it would be great if someone can help me out
Hey Thorsten!!!
I obviously know that my work is solely based on self-interestit was
just a way to answer Tor,and hence I am sure you know the way we have been
working out this project since some time :) . This email is basically
intended to let you know the progress of my work for the patch(as
Janit Anjaria wrote:
> It is actually a GSoC Task and i know it is a little early but
> Thorsten thinks starting a little early would surely help because
> this feature is something we dont want to compromise and more the
> time,better it is...
>
Hi Janit, all,
just to make one thing very clear -
Hey Tor!
Yeah you got that right. It is actually a GSoC Task and i know it is a
little early but Thorsten thinks starting a little early would surely help
because this feature is something we dont want to compromise and more the
time,better it is ( so we can always keep enhancing and that is why t
By the way, I now notice that this bug is not listen as an Easy Hack, but
is an actual GSoC task? So no wonder it is a lot of work and you are just
in the very early beginning of it;)
There seems to be some misunderstanding here... the intent is that GSoC
applicants do a relatively limited (but st
Hey Tor!
It is good to know that even you have been taking interest in this pretty
"important" task which i have been working on.
-- Regarding the compiling of the code , i bet i did compile it on my
machine as well,but as you said you have been getting some errors i would
be happy to look back i
If you just would have made it so in your patches from the start that your
code is at least compiled (and thus by necessity free from syntax and
language errors), it would have been easier to understand that it is a work
in progress. Sure, of course it should be OK to submit work on a bigger
task i
Hey!
I am hereby attaching my patch which is a work in progress.
Thorsten : Check out *Line number 148* in sd/source/core/sdtool.cxx where i
have mentioned(i.e. in the form of comment) the query i have in mind ,and
the question i had asked you on IRC. I hope the surrounding code would make
things
Hey Miklos!
I suppose i have used the correct header now ,and regarding the identation
i dont think there is any need of it here as the header file just declares
the functions used.I have made all the changes to the way the comments have
to be used and i am sure this learning process is going to h
Hi Janit,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:55:53AM +0530, Janit Anjaria
wrote:
> +/* -*- Mode: C++; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 4 -*-
> */
> +/*
> + * This file is part of the LibreOffice project.
> + *
> + * This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
Hey !
I am hereby attaching a patch for the same fdo#41572 and have made the
changes according Thorsten's advise and i am sure the comments would help
out in the understanding of what this header file will do. :)
Any further help and guidance would surely be helpful and great (in terms
of the exis
Janit Anjaria wrote:
> it would be great if someone can guide if i am going swrong
> somewhere.
>
Hi Janit,
a bit hard to tell without further explanations to the intended use of
the code. A few comments in the header would already go a long
way. Also, I suggest to make it a habit for new files to
Hey !
I am hereby attaching a patch that shows my initial work on the task ,and
it would be great if someone can guide if i am going swrong somewhere.
Though it is not complete according to my plans on the code,but still it
would be great if there is some more efficient code pointers someone can
p
13 matches
Mail list logo
