On 5 December 2012 05:58, David Tardon wrote:
>> makes even bigger difference for me. Then it's the ~same as using make -r.
>
> It is not the same thing. The .SUFFIXES special rule only deletes
> defined (i.e., built-in) suffix rules, but it does not affect built-in
> pattern rules. The -r flag d
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:45:43PM +0100, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've removed MAKEFLAGS+=-r in 0a45deba2be4a77db7540bd050b25bd6c26d7513
> because I thought it's supposed to be used only for recursive make
> invocation.
> Now I see, it really makes a difference (for a reason unknown to m
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:45:43PM +0100, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Now I see, it really makes a difference (for a reason unknown to me).
Yep, I didnt investigate it further too yet. Maybe the recursive CustomTargets?
> anyway.. using
> .SUFFIXES:
>
> makes even bigger difference for me. Then it
Hi,
I've removed MAKEFLAGS+=-r in 0a45deba2be4a77db7540bd050b25bd6c26d7513
because I thought it's supposed to be used only for recursive make
invocation.
Now I see, it really makes a difference (for a reason unknown to me).
It probably should be only MAKEFLAGS += r (there is no - in the
variable i
