On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Jesús Corrius wrote:
>> could anyone of the Windows experts please give me some insight,
>> why you're using MSVC for LO, instead of gcc ?
>>
>> Is there anything important that cannot be done w/ gcc ?
>
> Short version:
>
> The MSVC build is considered stable (ha
> could anyone of the Windows experts please give me some insight,
> why you're using MSVC for LO, instead of gcc ?
>
> Is there anything important that cannot be done w/ gcc ?
Short version:
The MSVC build is considered stable (has historically always been used
to compile OOo/LibO) while the gcc
Hi folks,
could anyone of the Windows experts please give me some insight,
why you're using MSVC for LO, instead of gcc ?
Is there anything important that cannot be done w/ gcc ?
thanks.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Enrico Weigelt
VNC - Virtual Network Consult GmbH
Head Of Dev