On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 12:14 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > reenabled editeng test again, and await inevitable fallout on some
> > platform or other.
>
> Keeping my fingers crossed. :-)
Inevitable platform fallout on windows happened, now
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>> Yes. Some of my changes were an attempt to address that
>
> ok, plan b, reorganize matters so that we bootstrap the initial uno
> component context once before all tests, and dispose it once after all
> tests are complete. Rather than se
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:14 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > *mumable* unotest::testDown has its "dispose" commented out ages ago,
> > putting that back in shows some other problems with various mixes of
> > global singletons that exist for
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 09:46 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
>> Crap. Maybe a unit test in editeng wasn't such a good idea after all.
>
> I disabled it and backed out a few bit for the moment. I have a fairly
> good idea what the various probl
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 09:46 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Crap. Maybe a unit test in editeng wasn't such a good idea after all.
I disabled it and backed out a few bit for the moment. I have a fairly
good idea what the various problems are so I might have a go at fixing
it up again in a bit.
*mum
On 12/04/12 15:46, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Crap. Maybe a unit test in editeng wasn't such a good idea after all.
while i haven't looked at what your test does, i noticed that a lot of
these so-called "unit tests" need pretty much a whole office to run
anyway, and it always takes a long time until
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:50 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 10:44 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 21:29 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 15:56 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> >>> Hey there,
> >>>
> >>> I'm trying to set up a new unit test for
On 04/11/2012 10:44 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 21:29 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 15:56 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hey there,
I'm trying to set up a new unit test for the edit engine core, but
struggling with one crasher.
http://cgit.freedesktop.or
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 21:29 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 15:56 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Hey there,
> >
> > I'm trying to set up a new unit test for the edit engine core, but
> > struggling with one crasher.
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?i
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 15:56 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I'm trying to set up a new unit test for the edit engine core, but
> struggling with one crasher.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=6089be1a7a17ae849d8793520e9d8d36296ed5cf
should get you closer anyway
Hey there,
I'm trying to set up a new unit test for the edit engine core, but
struggling with one crasher.
On the latest master, when you open
editeng/qa/unit/core-test.cxx
and uncomment line 132 and re-run make check, it fails with segmentation
fault. The backtrace is attached.
Anyone have a
11 matches
Mail list logo
