Hi Nino,
That's the beauty of our project, everyone's opinion is respected :) I'll
try to avoid adding any work to website team and see what method works best
to get these triaged and organized best. As of now, google doc + fdo seems
to be doing the trick :) Ultimately might just make a macro to a
Am 04.09.2012 23:05 schrieb Joel Madero:
> I agree that FDO has some benefits but the limitation is really that each user
> is needed to query every time, the possibility of overlap is great, and no
> one
> is really responsible for an individual bug until the query is made and
> someone
> takes
I agree that FDO has some benefits but the limitation is really that
each user is needed to query every time, the possibility of overlap is
great, and no one is really responsible for an individual bug until the
query is made and someone takes the time to look into it. I'm not sure
if others w
Am 04.09.2012 21:52 schrieb Joel Madero:
> Basically it would be really nice to be able to group and assign bugs the
> way that the document does. I think bugs are much more manageable this way
> and we've seen a relative spike in QA triaging activity since starting the
> process this way.
Ok, I s
Basically it would be really nice to be able to group and assign bugs the
way that the document does. I think bugs are much more manageable this way
and we've seen a relative spike in QA triaging activity since starting the
process this way. Not sure if you looked at the document but it's basically
Hi Joel,
Am 04.09.2012 19:18 schrieb Joel Madero:
> I have done a complete update of the google document, this being said, if
> you named a sheet to your name, it's gone. Noel pointed out that a lot of
> the bugs on the sheet were already triaged so I just started from scratch.
> I'm still hoping
Hi All,
I have done a complete update of the google document, this being said, if
you named a sheet to your name, it's gone. Noel pointed out that a lot of
the bugs on the sheet were already triaged so I just started from scratch.
I'm still hoping the web team can help us move this away from googl
Math was off for averages ;) still doing a good job everyone.
On Aug 29, 2012 9:40 PM, "Joel Madero" wrote:
> Well we're 24 days into the project and there is mostly good news
> (although some bad news is there as well). So bad news first.
>
> Overall we're down only about 200 or so bugs in 24 da
Well we're 24 days into the project and there is mostly good news (although
some bad news is there as well). So bad news first.
Overall we're down only about 200 or so bugs in 24 days. This takes into
account the new bugs since 8/5 that have been filed which has been a lot.
This is also good news
