Markus and Jan-Marek,
Thank you for the explanations for tinderbox failings. Unlucky timing in
the past, Being new to this I try to ignore nothing.
All the best,
Jim
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedeskto
;One of you
>broke
>the build of LibreOffice with your commit :-( Please commit and push a
>fix
>ASAP!"
>
>All commits have been +1'd by Jenkins.
>
>So before I break the build again I would very much appreciate commit
>pointers.
Simply said: Tinderboxes
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:05:28AM +0200, Shinnok wrote:
> Are all tinderboxes offline for the time being?
>
> https://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/HEAD/status.html
Try <https://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.html> instead.
Regards,
Miklos
signature.asc
Descr
Hi,
Are all tinderboxes offline for the time being?
https://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/HEAD/status.html
Regards,
Shinnok
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Jens,
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Jens Carl wrote:
>
> is it possible to get the system setup of the tinderboxes so I can recreate
> one for my own gcc test runs. I mean the OS and installed packages.
There are various tinderboxes, not all share the same setup.
The baseline sys
Hello,
is it possible to get the system setup of the tinderboxes so I can
recreate one for my own gcc test runs. I mean the OS and installed packages.
Maybe there even exists and ansible playbook, chef cookbook or something
else?
Thanks
Jens
Hi,
On Sunday, 2016-09-04 19:37:54 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> And indeed the volume of tinderbox mails is a problem, but fixing them
> requires
> work. Anyone volunteering for that?
I'll try to look after the Calc function test failures on
Linux-rpm_deb-x86_71-TDF and Linux-rpm_deb-x86_7
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 03:44:40PM +0200, Jan Iversen wrote:
> But as you say some tinderboxes send these mails very frequently, leading to
> the fact that everybody… just looks at the title and delete the mail, which
> is quite the opposite as what was hoped.
... or filters them a
Hi
I work on LibreOffice on a very regular basis, and still feel spammed about
these mails.
The mails as such are important, because the show we have a problem on master
which need to be solved. But as you say some tinderboxes send these mails very
frequently, leading to the fact that
Hi,
I don’t work on LibreOffice on regular basis, but whenever I do always
get spammed with those failing tinderboxes, so much that I just delete
them on sight now. So whatever purpose they meant to serve, they no
longer do it for me and if I really broke the build I won’t notice it.
I don’t
Hey,
if you have a windows tinderbox running please have a look if it is running
correctly right now. Looks like at least @38, @39, @42 and @51 experience a
deadlock in a test. I reverted the commit introducing the deadlock for now
so we have working Windows boxes again.
Regards,
Markus
_
Hi Stuart,
V Stuart Foote píše v Pá 02. 05. 2014 v 20:24 +:
> Thanks, but that "give a little love" was from the last TB's off-line cycle
> in February =)
Ah! Was searching the list if anybody is complaining about the recent
breakage, and did not check the date ;-)
> Issue is in there som
Kendy, *,
Thanks, but that "give a little love" was from the last TB's off-line cycle in
February =)
Anyhow, here are the range of commits since the last solid build 30 April and
the first crashed TB-39 build still showing in TB logs:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&
Hi Stuart,
V Stuart Foote píše v Út 04. 02. 2014 v 15:31 -0800:
> @Marcus, @Kendy, @Christian
>
> Other than Thorsten's TB 42, the Windows TinderBoxes of master (TBs 38, 39
> and 47) have been missing in action...
>
> Could you each give them a little love as time permi
@Marcus, @Kendy, @Christian
Other than Thorsten's TB 42, the Windows TinderBoxes of master (TBs 38, 39
and 47) have been missing in action...
Could you each give them a little love as time permits.
Thanks!
Stuart
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundatio
tinderboxes.
The way I did that for (currently defunct)
Linux-RHEL6-x86_64_14-with-check is with a
~/.tinbuild/phases/.sh containing
ulimit -c unlimited
Stephan
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org
Hi all,
these failures seems to be due to my OUString cleanup, although I
am not able to get log information from MacOSX-X86_64_43.
For Android, I see that lines that trigger the error (taking address of
a temporary) does not match the code that I get pulling latest master,
so it should be
OS X 10.8 has Bison 2.3 and I doubt Apple will be upgrading to anything
newer in the future either. We shouldn't be requiring anything newer,
unless we want to abandon our traditional policy that LibreOffice should be
buildable with a stock Xcode installation and no random collection of
add-on 3rd-
On Tuesday 26 of February 2013, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm urgently waiting for latest Master builds, but unfortunately
> Tinderboxes do not deliver.
>
> @6 shows a lot of red.
> @7 is green, but builds do not reach the server?
> [Bug 61482] New: MinGW: &q
On Tuesday 26 of February 2013, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm urgently waiting for latest Master builds, but unfortunately
> Tinderboxes do not deliver.
>
> @6 shows a lot of red.
> @7 is green, but builds do not reach the server?
> [Bug 61482] New: MinGW: &quo
ge in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/WIN-Tinderboxes-are-limping-tp4040189p4040191.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi,
I'm urgently waiting for latest Master builds, but unfortunately
Tinderboxes do not deliver.
@6 shows a lot of red.
@7 is green, but builds do not reach the server?
[Bug 61482] New: MinGW: "Index of /daily/master/Win-x86@7-MinGW" shows
several empty folders before &qu
MacOSX-Intel_3-OSX_10.6.0-gcc_4.0.1
and
Linux-Fedora17-x86_64_4-gcc-4.7-dbgutil
located at my place, will be off for the next ~7 days. And I'll be
mostly off the grid, too. ;)
All the best,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_
On 10/31/2012 08:01 AM, David Ostrovsky wrote:
It turns out that with this commit:
ed0b160041c46d74c81ba849f1f841eb5bdaba1c
the old configure options are gone: --with-num-cpus and --with-max-jobs.
The new one is --with-parallelism. Please adjust your tinderboxes
correspondingly.
...but the
your tinderboxes
correspondingly.
Regards
David
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
I fixed it by including the file defining the class ThumbnailViewItem.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=2cc9e1614e410e5f70db420122bdbf0601252f89
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=bf744412213eb8b78d68e3ede9fa4ac77b4e0422
Regards
David
On 07.07.2012 11:31, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
Im trying to fix this errors in the windows tinderboxes
templatedlg.o : error
Im trying to fix this errors in the windows tinderboxes
templatedlg.o : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "public:
bool __thiscall TemplateFolderView::moveTemplates(class std::set,class std::allocator >
&,unsigned short,bool)"
(?moveTemplates@TemplateFolderVi
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:21 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> I propose to have some 2 weeks worth of nightly builds around (to
> not fill up the disk entirely). Ok for everyone?
Of course, it'd be more ideal to have one weeks' worth, and then one
per week for the last 4+ weeks - but I ima
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to have some 2 weeks worth of nightly builds around (to
> not fill up the disk entirely). Ok for everyone?
ok with the caveat that we should always keep at least the last
successful build (that is the one pointed by the l
Hi,
I propose to have some 2 weeks worth of nightly builds around (to
not fill up the disk entirely). Ok for everyone?
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpnMtAk3SCuT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
htt
FYI:
the libreoffice-3.4 branch went through a successful daily build iteration.
It is now the primary lang=ALL daily
Norbert
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi *m
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
>>
> Christian, I added libreoffice-3-4
> to /srv/tinderbox/local_conf/TreeData.pm, I hope it is everything
> needed, can you please check?
Yes, all OK, the root, module & branch settings are ignored anyway, as
nobody thus far took the
Hi Thorsten, Norbert, Christian,
On 2011-04-01 at 10:21 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > would you want to add that branch to your nightly build rotation,
> > since you build all langs?
>
> yes. I will build all-lang on that branch and demote master to
> no-localization build (building both fu
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> Petr Mladek wrote:
>> libreoffice-3-4 branch is ready. Could we switch some tinderboxes to it?
>>
> Hi Norbert,
>
> would you want to add that branch to your nightly build rotation,
> since you build all langs?
Petr Mladek wrote:
> libreoffice-3-4 branch is ready. Could we switch some tinderboxes to it?
>
Hi Norbert,
would you want to add that branch to your nightly build rotation,
since you build all langs?
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpuCvDvWRdQp.pgp
Description: PGP sig
Hi,
libreoffice-3-4 branch is ready. Could we switch some tinderboxes to it?
Best Regards,
Petr
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
37 matches
Mail list logo
