Re: Thoughts on LibreOffice Math

2013-07-11 Thread Jonas Finnemann Jensen
> I think enabling the visual editor by default is indeed important. What is > blocking it from going out of experimental features? I think the GSOC > student who worked on that mentioned some crashes and I can try to debug > and fix them. Are there other serious bugs / missing features apart > und

Re: Thoughts on LibreOffice Math

2013-07-03 Thread Frédéric WANG
>/ problem with that is that there are actually 2 text editing components, />/ Writer and EditEngine (used by Impress/Draw/Calc)... the current />/ architecture of Math embedded objects has the advantage that it works />/ with both of these and so in all applications. / That is something we wi

Re: Thoughts on LibreOffice Math

2013-06-24 Thread Frédéric WANG
Can you please describe in more details what is wrong with the exported MathML? LibreOffice uses "Presentation Markup" and not "Content Markup". But besides that, what is bad? For example, - If you type "1 + 2x" then "2x" is interpreted as a single number rather than a number times a variable.

Re: Thoughts on LibreOffice Math

2013-06-24 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Frédéric, find comments inside. Frédéric WANG schrieb: Hi all, My name is Frédéric Wang and as some you may have noticed, I've recently contributed some patches for the LibreOffice Formula Editor. For those who don't know me: I work for the MathJax project, I've been contributing to the Moz

Thoughts on LibreOffice Math

2013-06-23 Thread Frédéric WANG
Hi all, My name is Frédéric Wang and as some you may have noticed, I've recently contributed some patches for the LibreOffice Formula Editor. For those who don't know me: I work for the MathJax project, I've been contributing to the Mozilla MathML project for several years and I recently star