Re: Testing 3.6.0alpha1

Hi Rainer, Rainer Bielefeld wrote (03-06-12 13:27) we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests” that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1. I thought we had introduced the alpha

Re: Testing 3.6.0alpha1

Rainer, Getting a build out of the door is a non-trivial amount of work. There is no way we want to block resources like this just 2 days before feature freeze. It will for sure be fixed in beta1, and with the work-arounds that are floating around, one should be able to test alpha1 too. Cheers F

Re: [PUSHED] fdo#48946 was: Testing 3.6.0alpha1

Pushed, thanks for it. Just wondering what went wrong. Did the gbuildification of the module change the library name? Anyway, thanks for tracking it down F. On 03/06/12 13:50, David Ostrovsky wrote: > Hi, > > On 03.06.2012 13:27, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we were not lucky, most user

[PATCH] fdo#48946 was: Testing 3.6.0alpha1

Hi, On 03.06.2012 13:27, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi, we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests” that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1. I looked at it and it turns out

Testing 3.6.0alpha1

Hi, we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests” that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1. What do you think about an alpha2? More details and a poll here: