Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-06-16 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 06/15/2017 03:45 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 06/15/2017 03:34 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: If there's no objections, I'd bump current master towards LO 6.0 to GCC 4.8. (4.8.1 even, so we'll have ref-qualifiers known-working everywhere and can drop HAVE_CXX11_REF_QUALIFIER.) done now wi

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-06-15 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 06/15/2017 03:34 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 03/29/2017 07:09 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Some of our baselines on current master (towards LO 5.4) are as follows: ** GCC 4.8.1: *** inheriting constructors *** ref-qualifiers FY

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-06-15 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 03/29/2017 07:09 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Some of our baselines on current master (towards LO 5.4) are as follows: ** GCC 4.8.1: *** inheriting constructors *** ref-qualifiers FYI: baseline CentOS with devtoolset has 4.8.2 Is

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-06-02 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 03/16/2017 12:20 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: * macOS 10.8 () Bumping this to macOS 10.9 would get rid of the last known case of !HAVE_THREADSAFE_STATICS (cf.

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-06-01 Thread Miklos Vajna
Hi Stephan, On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 09:49:31AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > I don't think your experiment is telling much. There are three cases to > consider: > > 1 A toolchain that doesn't support thread-safe statics. > > 2 A toolchain that correctly supports thread-safe statics. > >

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-06-01 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 05/31/2017 10:06 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote: As far as I can see it's the "because those setting up Android support didn't bother" case. The attached patch does not break opening Writer documents for me, so I guess it's safe to turn that "always false" to "always true", as it happens on macOS. I

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-05-31 Thread Miklos Vajna
Hi, On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:27:16AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > So after the recent bump to macOS 10.9, HAVE_THREADSAFE_STATICS should > effectively be true everywhere expect on Android (where configure.ac doesn't > bother at all to decide whether or not it would be true, always leaving

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-05-31 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 03/16/2017 12:48 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote: On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:20:54PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Bumping this to macOS 10.9 would get rid of the last known case of !HAVE_THREADSAFE_STATICS (cf.

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-05-19 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 05/19/2017 01:51 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: I don't mind bumping to 10.9. the box that do the realease is already at 10.9 anyway Note "Minutes of ESC call ..." * Mac OS X 10.8 support (Michael S) + the only

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-05-19 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > >> that box use 10.8sdk which come with libxml: >> #define LIBXML_DOTTED_VERSION "2.7.8" >> > > In a current SDK it is 2.9.4. I don't know how it has been updated in SDK > versions. But seriously, couldn't we bump the baseline to 10.9 by now?

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-05-19 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> that box use 10.8sdk which come with libxml: > #define LIBXML_DOTTED_VERSION "2.7.8" > > In a current SDK it is 2.9.4. I don't know how it has been updated in SDK versions. But seriously, couldn't we bump the baseline to 10.9 by now? That would also help the thread-safe statics thing, if I unders

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-05-19 Thread Miklos Vajna
Hi Norbert, On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 01:11:38PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > the code use input_id of parserCtxt which was introduced in 2.8 > > that box use 10.8sdk which come with libxml: > #define LIBXML_DOTTED_VERSION "2.7.8" is my attempt to addre

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-05-18 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:20:54PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann > wrote: >> * macOS 10.8 >> () >> >> Bumping this to macOS 10.9 would get rid of

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-05-17 Thread Miklos Vajna
Hi, On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:20:54PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > * macOS 10.8 > () > > Bumping this to macOS 10.9 would get rid of the last known case of > !HAVE_THREADSAFE_STATICS (cf. >

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Some of our baselines on current master (towards LO 5.4) are as follows: > […] > ** GCC 4.8.1: > *** inheriting constructors > *** ref-qualifiers FYI: baseline CentOS with devtoolset has 4.8.2 > […] > The question is what old ver

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-03-16 Thread Jan-Marek Glogowski
Am 16.03.2017 um 12:20 schrieb Stephan Bergmann: > Some of our baselines on current master (towards LO 5.4) are as follows: > > > * GCC 4.7 > ( > "configure: GCC 4.6 is no longer supported on maste

Re: Some baseline thoughts

2017-03-16 Thread Miklos Vajna
Hi, On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:20:54PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > * GCC 4.7 > ( > "configure: GCC 4.6 is no longer supported on master") openSUSE stable/SLE still defaults to gcc-4.8 (4.8.

Some baseline thoughts

2017-03-16 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Some of our baselines on current master (towards LO 5.4) are as follows: * GCC 4.7 ( "configure: GCC 4.6 is no longer supported on master") The latest version is GCC 6. Noteworthy C++ conform