Le 2012-11-22 05:06, Michael Meeks a écrit :
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 08:53 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
It would be best if TDF owned outright at least enough hardware to be
able to to a release on all supported platform..
Agreed.
In fact I thing we should have a pair of each. one t
I would be more then willing to administer this machine seeing as its my
own imac. My offer still stands.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 08:53 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > It would be best if TDF owned outright at least enough hardware to be
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 08:53 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> It would be best if TDF owned outright at least enough hardware to be
> able to to a release on all supported platform..
Agreed.
> In fact I thing we should have a pair of each. one that cna be 'lent'
> to dev to allow them to
Right now I am having nothing but nightmares with cppunit failing on said
imac trying to build against the 10.7 SDK. I will ping you on irc at some
point and maybe we can troubleshoot why I am having these issues.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> It would be best if TDF
It would be best if TDF owned outright at least enough hardware to be
able to to a release on all supported platform..
so I do agree with Thorsten request ot acquire a MAc, but I would also
add the need for a TDF owned windows box.
In fact I thing we should have a pair of each. one that cna be 'l
Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Thorsten I have my imac which isnt doing much when im not using it and I
> would be more then happy to setup my imac to be a tinderbox.
>
Hi Jonathan,
that's independently very useful - and you don't need that 10.4 SDK
for just building.
If that box can successfully bui
