On 05/23/2014 01:47 PM, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Eike Rathke mailto:er...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Friday, 2014-05-23 03:14:30 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> so by going through Lsan reports I noted that we have a few
classes in
> formula that are
Hey,
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On Friday, 2014-05-23 03:14:30 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
>
> > so by going through Lsan reports I noted that we have a few classes in
> > formula that are marked with SAL_NO_VTABLE and therefore have no virtual
> > pr
Hi Markus,
On Friday, 2014-05-23 03:14:30 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> so by going through Lsan reports I noted that we have a few classes in
> formula that are marked with SAL_NO_VTABLE and therefore have no virtual
> protected destructors, This prevents us from deleting some of these
> insta
Hey,
so by going through Lsan reports I noted that we have a few classes in
formula that are marked with SAL_NO_VTABLE and therefore have no virtual
protected destructors, This prevents us from deleting some of these
instances and it looks like people just leaked them in the past.
Is there any re
