Hi Philippe,
Philippe Jung píše v Út 12. 05. 2015 v 19:15 +0200:
> Kendy, it seems you don't apply renaming to modules other than sw.
That was deliberate - I renamed only the stuff in sw, for the other
modules only where sw depended on that (the script has 2 parts - sw/
only and global).
> I me
Kendy, it seems you don't apply renaming to modules other than sw.
I mean there are references to sw at least in comments in other modules (svx
for example). Maybe replacement should be done here too.
Philippe
Le 12 mai 2015 19:04:28 CEST, Jan Holesovsky a écrit :
>Hi Bjoern, all,
>
>Bjoern Mic
Hi Bjoern, all,
Bjoern Michaelsen píše v Čt 07. 05. 2015 v 14:56 +0200:
> IMHO lets leave Frm -> Frame out of the change in this round. In the end, we
> should have the SwFrm/sw::Frame situation sorted out in a consistent way,
> ideally with most of the Writer stuff actually namespaced in sw.
OK
I really have an aversion to the use of the word "Floater" as this has
lavatorial connotations in most of the English speaking world and leaves
a bit of a bad taste!
On 07/05/15 12:31, Noel Grandin wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
I know what a fly is, those are th
Would this change also include comments?
Judging by memory, this should also work for the remaining German comments
as they are neologisms anyway.
Philipp
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailma
On 07.05.2015 13:31, Noel Grandin wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
>>
>> I know what a fly is, those are the frames around which text gets
>> wrapped in Writer. SwFlyFrm even contains a doxygen comment saying the
>> same. I'm not convinced that "floater" would be any c
Hi,
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:46:51AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Frm -> Frame (to handle things like SwFrm, SwCellFrm, SwRowFrm,
> SwColumnFrm, ..., SwFrmFmt, FrmMap, SwFlyFrm, etc.)
IMHO lets leave Frm -> Frame out of the change in this round. In the end, we
should have the SwFrm/sw::Frame
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Tor Lillqvist píše v Čt 07. 05. 2015 v 12:04 +0300:
>
> > While at it, could we also come up with a new term for the "fly"
> > concept (and its plural, "flys") please? I hate flies. How about
> > "floater", if floating is what a fly does?
>
> Sounds good to me too - any obj
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
>
> I know what a fly is, those are the frames around which text gets
> wrapped in Writer. SwFlyFrm even contains a doxygen comment saying the
> same. I'm not convinced that "floater" would be any clearer than "fly",
> though. Especially as we a
On 05/07/2015 12:28 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 07.05.2015 12:07, Philippe Jung wrote:
Hi,
Grf for Graphic (SwGrfShell, SwGrfNode, SwGrfExtPage, SwWebGrfShell...)
May I also propose to replace Sw by LOw :-)
i like your proposed prefix - it also sets the expectation for the
quality of the code
On 07.05.2015 12:07, Philippe Jung wrote:
> Hi,
> Grf for Graphic (SwGrfShell, SwGrfNode, SwGrfExtPage, SwWebGrfShell...)
> May I also propose to replace Sw by LOw :-)
i like your proposed prefix - it also sets the expectation for the
quality of the code properly.
___
Hi Kendy,
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 11:23:12AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky
wrote:
> Tor Lillqvist píše v Čt 07. 05. 2015 v 12:04 +0300:
>
> > While at it, could we also come up with a new term for the "fly"
> > concept (and its plural, "flys") please? I hate flies. How about
> > "floater", if floating
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>
>> Grf for Graphic (SwGrfShell, SwGrfNode, SwGrfExtPage, SwWebGrfShell...)
>
>
> Actually, isn't "Image" better? I have always felt a bit strange seeing
> "Graphic" used as a singular noun, even if wiktionary does say that it is
> idiomatic.
>
> Grf for Graphic (SwGrfShell, SwGrfNode, SwGrfExtPage, SwWebGrfShell...)
>
Actually, isn't "Image" better? I have always felt a bit strange seeing
"Graphic" used as a singular noun, even if wiktionary does say that it is
idiomatic.
--tml
___
LibreOffic
Hi,
Grf for Graphic (SwGrfShell, SwGrfNode, SwGrfExtPage, SwWebGrfShell...)
May I also propose to replace Sw by LOw :-)
Philippe
Le 7 mai 2015 10:46:51 CEST, Jan Holesovsky a écrit :
>Hi,
>
>I mentioned at the ESC that I'd like to do some larger renaming in sw/,
>and got an ac
Hi Norbert,
Norbert Thiebaud píše v Čt 07. 05. 2015 v 04:39 -0500:
> What is the projected timeline ?
> before/after the branch-point to 5.0 ? ( I'm asking because of the
> impact on cherry-picking maintenance going forward)
Before 5.0 branch-point was my plan - sometime on Monday probably [so
t
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Hi Tor,
>
> Tor Lillqvist píše v Čt 07. 05. 2015 v 12:04 +0300:
>
>> While at it, could we also come up with a new term for the "fly"
>> concept (and its plural, "flys") please? I hate flies. How about
>> "floater", if floating is what a fly
Hi Tor,
Tor Lillqvist píše v Čt 07. 05. 2015 v 12:04 +0300:
> While at it, could we also come up with a new term for the "fly"
> concept (and its plural, "flys") please? I hate flies. How about
> "floater", if floating is what a fly does?
Sounds good to me too - any objections from Bjoern / Caol
While at it, could we also come up with a new term for the "fly" concept
(and its plural, "flys") please? I hate flies. How about "floater", if
floating is what a fly does?
Or is being able to talk naturally about "flys" just one of the competences
one has to acquire in order to call oneself a Cer
Hi,
I mentioned at the ESC that I'd like to do some larger renaming in sw/,
and got an action item to send the list first; so here it is.
I did not mean to change namespace (eg. do not want to change SwFrm to
sw::Frame) as that would make it harder to grep (and could potentially
cause l
20 matches
Mail list logo
