On 04/02/2012 05:49 PM, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
2012/4/2 Stephan Bergmann:
And once these better tests offer coverage comparable to the old ones, we can
finally ditch them.
I would prefer an incremental process here, but that is just my
opinion. I think it makes sense every time a interface is
2012/4/2 Stephan Bergmann :
> On 04/02/2012 01:29 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
>>
>> So moving them to CppUnit would at least be a step in the right direction?
>
>
> I don't think simply rewriting them from Java to C++ in their current form
> is worth it. It would be better to replace them with better
On 04/02/2012 01:29 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
So moving them to CppUnit would at least be a step in the right direction?
I don't think simply rewriting them from Java to C++ in their current
form is worth it. It would be better to replace them with better tests.
And once these better tests of
On 2012-04-02 13:43, Michael Stahl wrote:
sure, as long as you're not just blindly translating the stupid
qadevOOo test to C++;
Ah, but that's why it's an __EasyHack__ :-)
But yes, I agree, building upon such a change to improve the test
infrastructure is a better idea.
Disclaimer: http://
On 02/04/12 13:29, Noel Grandin wrote:
>
>
> On 2012-04-02 13:16, Michael Stahl wrote:
>> the tests that are implemented in the "qadevOOo" module (aka "unoapi"
>> tests, run via various $MODULE/qa/unoapi/$MODULE.sce files) are pretty
>> awful in general and replacing them with something better
On 2012-04-02 13:16, Michael Stahl wrote:
there are however various UNO API tests that are written in Java with
JUnit, i guess you're talking about those.
That is correct.
the tests that are implemented in the "qadevOOo" module (aka "unoapi"
tests, run via various $MODULE/qa/unoapi/$MODULE.
On 26/03/12 11:56, Noel Grandin wrote:
> Hi
>
> I note that some of the C++ unit tests are being run from JUnit, which
> seems counter-intuitive.
writing C++ unit tests in Java would be rather impossible.
there are however various UNO API tests that are written in Java with
JUnit, i guess you'r
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:56 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> I note that some of the C++ unit tests are being run from JUnit, which
> seems counter-intuitive.
:-)
> Is there is a good reason for this, or would it simplify matters to
> convert them to CppUnit?
Everything we convert
