Re: make error: undefined reference to

2017-01-21 Thread Jan Iversen
HI As I told you on IRC. you miss the Collada library, this was not downloaded when you downloaded build-dependencies. This is something that happens quite frequently, because the build-dependencies are fixed with the ubuntu version, and thus if we on master start using a new library it will

Re: Make error for barcode extension

2013-12-19 Thread Marina Latini
" , libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org Inviato: Giovedì, 19 dicembre 2013 7:53:38 Oggetto: Re: Make error for barcode extension On 2013-12-18 14:40, Marina Latini wrote: > Risoluzione di ooo.itc.hu (ooo.itc.hu)... 91.208.36.36 > Connessione a ooo.itc.hu (ooo.itc.hu)|91.208.36.36|:80... fallito

Re: Make error for barcode extension

2013-12-18 Thread Noel Grandin
On 2013-12-18 14:40, Marina Latini wrote: Risoluzione di ooo.itc.hu (ooo.itc.hu)... 91.208.36.36 Connessione a ooo.itc.hu (ooo.itc.hu)|91.208.36.36|:80... fallito: Connessione rifiutata. That looks like an internet connectivity problem. Either your proxy stuff is not configured correctly, or

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 03/20/2013 03:37 PM, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: But then still what is here the rule and what is here an exception? The rule is we still must stick to -target 1.6. And the exception is that one distro can only handle -source 1.5 & -target 1.5 for now. So sensible default would be to only have

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:37:45PM +0100, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: > Quoting Rene Engelhard : > > >On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:22:59PM +0100, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: > >>But why do we still stick to 1.5 source and target version of > >>bytecode anyway? > > > >Wven when we didn't, you ne

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:37:45PM +0100, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: > Which bring me to the question why? UNO java bridge doesn't support 1.7? Generic Linux builds are created on RHEL5, that only has openjdk6. Likewise, Android only supports 1.6 as well. signature.asc Description: Digital sign

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread d . ostrovsky
Quoting Rene Engelhard : On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:22:59PM +0100, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: But why do we still stick to 1.5 source and target version of bytecode anyway? Wven when we didn't, you need to use =1.6 (if you built with java7) Which bring me to the question why? UNO java brid

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:22:59PM +0100, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: > But why do we still stick to 1.5 source and target version of bytecode anyway? Wven when we didn't, you need to use =1.6 (if you built with java7) which would still keep the need for -target so this is (at least half) a no-op

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:26:35PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > > But why do we still stick to 1.5 source and target version of bytecode > > anyway? > > AFAIK the reason for that is called Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, which does not > have a Java 1.6 implementation available (otherwise it would be

RE: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Winfried Donkers
Hi Michael, > try removing gcj instead. I did; autogen.sh went fine, make is now running. Thank you for your advise, I will report when it doesn't help in the end :) Winfried ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Michael Stahl
On 20/03/13 12:33, Winfried Donkers wrote: > Hi Michael, > > >> that is very odd, your javac does not understand -source and -target >> parameters. can you try installing OpenJDK instead? > > I have java-1_6_0-openjdk installed. > I also trried with java-1_7_0-openjdk, but that had the same re

RE: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Winfried Donkers
Hi Michael, > that is very odd, your javac does not understand -source and -target > parameters. can you try installing OpenJDK instead? I have java-1_6_0-openjdk installed. I also trried with java-1_7_0-openjdk, but that had the same result, so I switched backup to 1_6. Should I remove java-

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Michael Stahl
On 20/03/13 12:22, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: > Quoting Michael Stahl : > >> >> that is very odd, your javac does not understand -source and -target >> parameters. [...] > that is not odd at all: > http://linux.die.net/man/1/gcj > > the arguments are different there > -fsource > -ftarget > > an

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread d . ostrovsky
Quoting Michael Stahl : that is very odd, your javac does not understand -source and -target parameters. [...] that is not odd at all: http://linux.die.net/man/1/gcj the arguments are different there -fsource -ftarget and because it is not the first time someone fails into it http://nabble.d

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Michael Stahl
On 20/03/13 11:54, Winfried Donkers wrote: > I upgraded my machine to openSUSE 12.3, did a ./g pull --rebase and ran > make dev-install, resulting in the following error: > [build JCS] Jar/ridl > > javac: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-source’ > > javac: error: 1.5: Bestand of map