On 04/22/2013 01:17 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 01:04:30PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 04/17/2013 04:45 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:13:15PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
What good is the intermediate move? That is, was there at least
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 01:04:30PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 04/17/2013 04:45 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:13:15PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> >>What good is the intermediate move? That is, was there at least one
> >>situation in which it would have hel
On 04/17/2013 04:45 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:13:15PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
What good is the intermediate move? That is, was there at least one
situation in which it would have helped your debugging if an
existing RTL_LOGFILE_* call had been behaving like
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:13:15PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> What good is the intermediate move? That is, was there at least one
> situation in which it would have helped your debugging if an
> existing RTL_LOGFILE_* call had been behaving like SAL_LOG?
Yes, there had been: I was trying to
I am more and more starting to be of the opinion that all debugging
printouts, SAL_INFO() (or RTL_foo) are mostly useless once the bug or
misfeature you have been chasing (for which you have added the
debugging logging) has been found and fixed;)
If and when later some other bug in the same area
On 04/17/2013 03:39 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
please note:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/3421/
and raise any violent opposition to this move here, if there is no such
opposition on the ESC call, Im going to push it tommorrow.
The rationale (beyond what is in the commit message) is as
