Re: cppunit Patch feature-modernize

Hi Markus, about the size_t changes. Most correct seams for me a solution to change all these to size_t and avoid casting, but that is a lot of work. Let me know, if you need some kind of support. Also, i saw, that you have not merges documentation termination for \n to \\n or c:\path to c:\\p

Re: cppunit Patch feature-modernize

Hi, > Am 01.10.2021 um 12:47 schrieb Markus Mohrhard > : > > Hey, > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 4:02 AM Florian Becker > wrote: > Hi Markus, > > thanks a lot. > > Is there a list of compiler, which are supported? Also, is there any reason, > why cppunit cannot upgrade t

Re: cppunit Patch feature-modernize

Hey, On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 4:02 AM Florian Becker wrote: > Hi Markus, > > thanks a lot. > > Is there a list of compiler, which are supported? Also, is there any > reason, why cppunit cannot upgrade to c++17? > This would force all dependent projects to use C++17 as well. Already the move to C+

Re: cppunit Patch feature-modernize

Hi Markus, thanks a lot. Is there a list of compiler, which are supported? Also, is there any reason, why cppunit cannot upgrade to c++17? I would like to create a cmake definition - do we handle that the same way? Regards, Florian > Am 30.09.2021 um 21:56 schrieb Markus Mohrhard > : > > 

Re: cppunit Patch feature-modernize

Hey Florian, On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 1:52 AM Markus Mohrhard < markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hey Florian, > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 5:59 PM Florian Becker wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> i have patched the libcppunit 1.15.1 to modernize and use clang flags >> with highest flag settings. Hop

Re: cppunit Patch feature-modernize

Hey Florian, On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 5:59 PM Florian Becker wrote: > Hello, > > i have patched the libcppunit 1.15.1 to modernize and use clang flags > with highest flag settings. Hopefully you can integrate this patch > inside master. https://github.com/VXAPPS/cppunit/tree/feature-modernize > >

Re: cppunit Patch feature-modernize

Hi Florian, On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 05:27:56PM +, Florian Becker wrote: > i have patched the libcppunit 1.15.1 to modernize and use clang flags > with highest flag settings. Hopefully you can integrate this patch > inside master. https://github.com/VXAPPS/cppunit/tree/feature-modernize >

Re: cppunit

Hey David, On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 8:29 AM David Wiseman wrote: > Hi, > >As a developer, if make a contribution to the cppunit project, is it > just required that it builds, or are there tests that I should run. And I > guess I would contribute to the test suite also. Can you tell me if

Re: Cppunit 1.15.0 and Cppunit 1.15.1 aren't tagged in GIT repo

Hey, On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 7:51 PM Christian Madsen wrote: > The two mentioned versions aren’t tagged in the git:// > anongit.freedesktop.org/git/libreoffice/cppunit/ repository. > > > > The last tagged version is cppunit-1.14.0. > they are at least tagged in the pushed version at https://ger

Re: CppUnit SdMiscTest::testTdf119956 Failing on Windows with 150% scale factor

Am 21. Mai 2019 00:48:40 MESZ schrieb Regina Henschel : >I get curious results. > >If I run the single test using >/opt/lo/bin/make CppunitTest_sd_misc_tests >CPPUNIT_TEST_NAME="testTdf119956" CPPUNITTRACE=TRUE >or >/opt/lo/bin/make CppunitTest_sd_misc_tests >CPPUNIT_TEST_NAME="testTdf119956" >

Re: CppUnit SdMiscTest::testTdf119956 Failing on Windows with 150% scale factor

Hi Luke, I get curious results. If I run the single test using /opt/lo/bin/make CppunitTest_sd_misc_tests CPPUNIT_TEST_NAME="testTdf119956" CPPUNITTRACE=TRUE or /opt/lo/bin/make CppunitTest_sd_misc_tests CPPUNIT_TEST_NAME="testTdf119956" it does _not_ fail. If I run the test among other test

Re: CppUnit updates

Hey, On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 6:22 AM Andrés Maldonado wrote: > Hello, > > I was working on EasyHack 122169 > and > submitted a patch to Gerrit, > but the Jenkins build failed because the comm

Re: CppUnit compiler support

Hey Spencer, On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:31 PM FRISBY, SPENCER G CIV USAF AFMC 518 SMXS/MXDX wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if CppUnit 1.14 has support to be compiled by Green Hills > MULTI 4.2.4 C++ compiler. > > If it does, could you provide me documentation that outlines the steps to > take?

Re: cppunit 1.14.0 doesn't ship cppunit.m4

Thanks Rene, will try that. Andor On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 07:00:30AM +0200, Andor Molnar wrote: > >Is there a better way to configure libcppunit that we should migrate > to? > > pkg-config. > > Regards, > > Rene > __

Re: cppunit 1.14.0 doesn't ship cppunit.m4

Hi, On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 07:00:30AM +0200, Andor Molnar wrote: >Is there a better way to configure libcppunit that we should migrate to? pkg-config. Regards, Rene ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.free

Re: Cppunit

Hey, On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:55 AM, Z223I . wrote: > Thanks for keeping the project alive! It is been 10 years since I have > used the program. > > I am getting an error while loading shared libraries: libcppunit-1.14.so.0. > > Made a copy of the money example. Used the command: > g++ -std=c+

Re: [cppunit] specific test selection

On 04.01.2018 17:10, th.la...@arcor.de wrote: > how do I select a varying, but specific group of tests? > Is it just possible as hard-coded definition of a certain test suite, > which could be separated by a compiler directive? > No way to specify an individual pattern refering to the test case tag

Re: [cppunit] aborting the test case for failing condition

On 04.01.2018 17:30, malervier...@arcor.de wrote: > we are missing some fatal aborting assertions, i.e. the equivalents of all > current comparisons, but causing an (immediate) abort. Sometimes the > continuation of following tests makes no sense ... > > I could imagine the use of CPPUNIT_FAIL(m

Re: CppUnit: Implementation of CPPUNIT_ASSERT: bug or feature?

On 27.04.2017 09:42, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> CPPUNIT_ASSERT( aBitmapEx.GetAlpha() ); > > and the condition is of type AlphaMask that has an overloaded operator ! > -- but no conversion to bool, which is probably a design bug of its own.) well it's a design bug of C++, allowing and encouraging

Re: Cppunit test failing in basic/qa/cppunit

On 11/29/2015 05:05 PM, Markus Mohrhard wrote: ... ... /home/beppe/lo-github-beppe/basic/qa/cppunit/test_scanner.cxx:582:(anonymous namespace)::ScannerTest::testNumbers equality assertion failed - Expected: 0.3 - Actual : 0.3 test_scanner.cxx:582:Assertion Test

Re: Cppunit test failing in basic/qa/cppunit

Hi, On 11/29/2015 03:36 PM, Markus Mohrhard wrote: Hey, On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Giuseppe Castagno mailto:giuseppe.casta...@acca-esse.eu>> wrote: Hi all, Building under Kubuntu 14.04 32 bit I got the following, master is f863f70, autogen.lastrun: ... test_scanner.cxx

Re: Cppunit test failing in basic/qa/cppunit

Hey, On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Giuseppe Castagno < giuseppe.casta...@acca-esse.eu> wrote: > Hi all, > > Building under Kubuntu 14.04 32 bit I got the following, master is > f863f70, autogen.lastrun: > > --with-vendor= > --with-gdrive-client-id= > --with-gdrive-client-secret= >

Re: cppunit errors in vcl_app_test, on illumos/xstreamos

Le 23/02/15 09:33, Gabriele Bulfon a écrit : Oh yes, I found this in Library_vcl.mk: ifeq ($(CPUNAME),SPARC64) $(eval $(call gb_Library_add_ldflags,vcl,\ -R/usr/sfw/lib/64 \ )) else $(eval $(call gb_Library_add_ldflags,vcl,\ -R/usr/sfw/lib \ )) endif My system fall into the "else" section...and t

Re: cppunit errors in vcl_app_test, on illumos/xstreamos

Oh yes, I found this in Library_vcl.mk: ifeq ($(CPUNAME),SPARC64) $(eval $(call gb_Library_add_ldflags,vcl,\ -R/usr/sfw/lib/64 \ )) else $(eval $(call gb_Library_add_ldflags,vcl,\ -R/usr/sfw/lib \ )) endif My system fall into the "else" section...and this is breaking my build. I will try commenting

Re: CppUnit

Hey Walter, On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Walter Borges wrote: > Hello > > Is this test library still maintained? Yes. I'm working from time to time on it and are currently working towards a new release with most likely two new features. > > If so, is there a way to run tests in parallel to

Re: CppUnit

Hi Walter, On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 06:49:38PM -0400, Walter Borges wrote: > Is this test library still maintained? Yes, Markus is your man. > If so, is there a way to run tests in parallel to take advantage of multi > core processors? As far as I know this is not currently possible -- what we

Re: CppUnit wstring support

On 07/04/2014 06:10 AM, Randall Britten wrote: Is there a plan to include wstring support out-of-the-box for CppUnit? If not, and in the mean time, what is the “correct” way to add support for wstring, (e.g. such that the following will compile on a strict compiler such as the one included with X

Re: CppUnit Framework

Hey, On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Fouda Manga, Christian < christian.fouda_ma...@siemens.com> wrote: > Hi, > > we are using CppUnit Framework to test gas analyser which are safety > relevant products. For the certification of the product, we have to do the > following: > > >1. show the

Re: CppUnit CMake build system

Hi, On 13.12.2013 16:56, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > Hey, > > > 2013/12/12 Bernhard Seßler > >> Hi @cppunit developers / users, >> >> > > > So in general I'm very happy to accept patches: I'm just not convinced that > another build system is the right step right now. We provide MSVC > projec

Re: CppUnit CMake build system

Hey, 2013/12/12 Bernhard Seßler > Hi @cppunit developers / users, > > I'm currently working on replacing the autoconf build system and the MSVC > solutions used by cppunit with a CMake based build system. Currently it > successfully builds the libraries on Windows and Linux - using the GCC, > M

Re: cppunit framework

Ok. Thank you for explanation. :-) On Oct 22, 2013 5:41 AM, "Markus Mohrhard" wrote: Hey, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:20:01PM -0200, José Guilherme Vanz < > v...@libreoffice.org> wrote: > > has libo its own cppunit? I was thinking that it uses the old project of > > cppunit in the sourceforge.c

Re: cppunit framework

Hey, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:20:01PM -0200, José Guilherme Vanz < > v...@libreoffice.org> wrote: > > has libo its own cppunit? I was thinking that it uses the old project of > > cppunit in the sourceforge.com > > Markus knows the details, but in short the new upstream is on > freedesktop.org.

Re: cppunit framework

Hi, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:20:01PM -0200, José Guilherme Vanz wrote: > has libo its own cppunit? I was thinking that it uses the old project of > cppunit in the sourceforge.com Markus knows the details, but in short the new upstream is on freedesktop.org. So no, this is not "our" cppunit, e

Re: cppunit framework

Hi, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:29:22AM -0200, José Guilherme Vanz wrote: > Why Libreoffice uses cppunit, considering that is abandoned project? Is > legacy? No, it's not legacy at all. The up to date git repo is here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/cppunit Miklos signature.asc Desc

Re: CPPUNIT road map, recent changes etc.

Hey, > >>2012/10/30 John McCabe : >>> Just found this fork but a bit disappointed with the lack of >>information on >>> the wiki. Is there a road map? What are the changes between 1.12.1 >>and the >>> latest release? Has documentation been updated? >>> >> >>You can find the updates for 1.13.0 in >

Re: CPPUNIT road map, recent changes etc.

Markus, Markus Mohrhard wrote: >2012/10/30 John McCabe : >> Just found this fork but a bit disappointed with the lack of >information on >> the wiki. Is there a road map? What are the changes between 1.12.1 >and the >> latest release? Has documentation been updated? >> > >You can find the upda

Re: CPPUNIT road map, recent changes etc.

On 01/11/2012 10:17, Michael Meeks wrote: On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 22:29 +, John McCabe wrote: Just found this fork but a bit disappointed with the lack of information on the wiki. Is there a road map? What are the changes between 1.12.1 and the latest release? Has documentation been updated?

Re: CPPUNIT road map, recent changes etc.

On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 22:29 +, John McCabe wrote: > Just found this fork but a bit disappointed with the lack of > information on the wiki. Is there a road map? What are the changes > between 1.12.1 and the latest release? Has documentation been > updated? Help updating the wiki woul

Re: CPPUNIT road map, recent changes etc.

2012/10/30 John McCabe : > Just found this fork but a bit disappointed with the lack of information on > the wiki. Is there a road map? What are the changes between 1.12.1 and the > latest release? Has documentation been updated? > You can find the updates for 1.13.0 in http://cgit.freedesktop.org

RE: Cppunit-1.13.0 released

Hi Dennis, On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 12:39 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > It is obviously a fork. Ho hum; you're aware of the interaction history we have had with those working on the original cppunit ? I'd be interested in how they would characterise it. > making a clean fork ... bette

RE: Cppunit-1.13.0 released

org] On Behalf Of Markus Mohrhard Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2012 10:56 To: Andreas Radke Cc: steph...@archlinux.org; Michael Meeks; libreoffice-dev; Stephan Bergmann Subject: Re: Cppunit-1.13.0 released Hello Andreas, > Have you forked the original project? I can't find the new release in

Re: Cppunit-1.13.0 released

Hello David, >> >> after we have no longer any build issues with cppunit I have now >> officially tagged the 1.13.0 release of cppunit. I would like to thank >> everybody who helped during this release. >> >> The changes against the 1.12.1 release are: >> >> - improved windows build experience (V

Re: Cppunit-1.13.0 released

Hello Andreas, > Have you forked the original project? I can't find the new release in > the projects page at If you call taking over a dead project forking then we did it. The old upstream project did not commit any code for around 3 or 4 years and did not respond to bug reports or comments on

Re: Cppunit-1.13.0 released

Hello, Markus, On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 04:19:39AM +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > Hey, > > after we have no longer any build issues with cppunit I have now > officially tagged the 1.13.0 release of cppunit. I would like to thank > everybody who helped during this release. > > The changes against

Re: Cppunit-1.13.0 released

hello, git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/libreoffice/cppunit/ or http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/cppunit/ regards On 07/07/2012 09:40 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: Am Sat, 7 Jul 2012 04:19:39 +0200 schrieb Markus Mohrhard : Hey, after we have no longer any build issues with cpp

Re: Cppunit-1.13.0 released

hello, updated :-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CppUnit regards On 07/07/2012 04:19 AM, Markus Mohrhard wrote: Hey, after we have no longer any build issues with cppunit I have now officially tagged the 1.13.0 release of cppunit. I would like to thank everybody who helped during this release.

Re: Cppunit-1.13.0 released

Am Sat, 7 Jul 2012 04:19:39 +0200 schrieb Markus Mohrhard : > Hey, > > after we have no longer any build issues with cppunit I have now > officially tagged the 1.13.0 release of cppunit. I would like to thank > everybody who helped during this release. Have you forked the original project? I can