Re: cppumaker crash ...

2012-11-13 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 15:38 +0100, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: > Lessons learned: when some external module is moved to tail_build (or > gbuildified for that matter) one test schould be always done: > uninstall the corresponding system lib and make clean LO build. Sounds sensible; of

Re: cppumaker crash ...

2012-11-13 Thread d . ostrovsky
Hi Michael, Quoting Michael Meeks : On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 11:49 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: >I guess some include flags changed somewhere :-) still chasing. boost was added to tail_build recently, so it could possibly be caused by a missing dependency, i.e. something is built before boos

Re: cppumaker crash ...

2012-11-13 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:49:39AM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 13/11/12 11:42, Michael Meeks wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 22:11 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > >>Trying to unwind why the linux tinderboxen seem to like to crash > >> during build of udkapi - it seemed (to me) that the

Re: cppumaker crash ...

2012-11-13 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 11:49 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > > I guess some include flags changed somewhere :-) still chasing. > > boost was added to tail_build recently, so it could possibly be caused > by a missing dependency, i.e. something is built before boost and finds > the system boost h

Re: cppumaker crash ...

2012-11-13 Thread Michael Stahl
On 13/11/12 11:42, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 22:11 +, Michael Meeks wrote: >> Trying to unwind why the linux tinderboxen seem to like to crash >> during build of udkapi - it seemed (to me) that there was some horrible stack >> corruption going on > > It -looks-

Re: cppumaker crash ...

2012-11-13 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 22:11 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Trying to unwind why the linux tinderboxen seem to like to crash > during build of udkapi - it seemed (to me) that there was some horrible stack > corruption going on It -looks- like this is some system vs. internal boost iss