On 20/02/12 17:50, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Stephan Bergmann
> wrote:
>> [including LO ML on cc, hope you don't mind; context for new readers:
> no problem.
>
>> Does anybody have an idea how to solve this elegantly?
>>
>> One solution might be to undo the mech
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> [including LO ML on cc, hope you don't mind; context for new readers:
no problem.
> Does anybody have an idea how to solve this elegantly?
>
> One solution might be to undo the mechanism by which a cxx only needed in
> subsequentcheck is
[including LO ML on cc, hope you don't mind; context for new readers:
officecfg/CppunitTest_officecfg_cppheader_test.mk requires
officecfg/qa/cppheader.cxx, which indirectly includes headers from
higher up the module hierarchy; plain "make" build logs show that the
cxx is needlessly compiled, c
