Hello everyone,
Le 16/05/2018 à 10:42, Noel Grandin a écrit :
>
>
> On 2018/05/16 10:23 AM, Michael Stahl wrote:
>> there is a bytecode representation for StarBasic that is used if you
>> store "encrypted" macros inside a document - i.e. the StarBasic
>> source code is encrypted then, but an unenc
Hi,
On Wednesday, 2018-05-16 10:42:22 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> On 2018/05/16 10:23 AM, Michael Stahl wrote:
> > there is a bytecode representation for StarBasic that is used if you
> > store "encrypted" macros inside a document - i.e. the StarBasic source
> > code is encrypted then, but an un
On 2018/05/16 10:23 AM, Michael Stahl wrote:
there is a bytecode representation for StarBasic that is used if you store "encrypted" macros inside a document - i.e.
the StarBasic source code is encrypted then, but an unencrypted bytecode representation is stored as well that can be
executed wit
On 15/05/18 22:27, Eike Rathke wrote:
BUT, probably for some (stream?) compatibility (or oversight?), for
example the TypeLen() function still returns an int16 value because the
result is stored as an int16 (while seeing that, I think it could be
fixed). Also, for persistent storage UTF-16 may h
Hi Andrew,
On Tuesday, 2018-05-15 13:43:15 +, Andrew Pitonyak wrote:
> Last time I documented Strings and arrays, an array index was limited to
> +/-32K and a string was similarly limited.
>
> I am now documenting them again and I am hoping that someone knows off hand
> what the new limitati
