Re: Requiring SSE2 on Windows

On Thursday 07 of May 2020, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Hi Rene, > > rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote: > > So you seriously want LO dropped from Debian on all architectures? > > (Since all release architectures have to be in sync. And i386 is > > one.). > > The original proposal was asking for Window

Re: Requiring SSE2 on Windows

On 07.05.20 01:06, Thorsten Behrens wrote: The original proposal was asking for Windows - and it appears that is not controversial. Most of the benefits for the project (dropping custom patches for externals) might then not materialise for the moment, but hey. actually i'm not aware of a patc

Re: Requiring SSE2 on Windows

Hi, So you seriously want LO dropped from Debian on all architectures? (Since all release architectures have to be in sync. And i386 is one.). The original proposal was asking for Windows - and it appears that is not controversial. I know. I was replying to Noel, wo said: " Those distros

Re: Requiring SSE2 on Windows

Hi Rene, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote: > So you seriously want LO dropped from Debian on all architectures? > (Since all release architectures have to be in sync. And i386 is > one.). > The original proposal was asking for Windows - and it appears that is not controversial. Most of the benefi

Re: Requiring SSE2 on Windows

Am 6. Mai 2020 21:14:38 MESZ schrieb Noel Grandin : >On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 12:19, Rene Engelhard wrote: > >> That's not relevant for 32bit Linux distros. It doesn't matter what >the >> hardware would support - what matters is what the baseline is >targetted >> to support. >> >> >Those distros are

Re: Requiring SSE2 on Windows

On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 12:19, Rene Engelhard wrote: > That's not relevant for 32bit Linux distros. It doesn't matter what the > hardware would support - what matters is what the baseline is targetted > to support. > > Those distros are targetted at people using embedded type things for which Libre

Re: Requiring SSE2 on Windows

On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 08:58:00PM +0200, Luboš Luňák wrote: > On Tuesday 05 of May 2020, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > (FWIW, when -msse2 was discussed for 32-bit Linux x86 in the context of > > >tml> "Re: Test File: sc/qa

Re: Requiring SSE2 on Windows

On Tuesday 05 of May 2020, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Hi Luboš, > > Luboš Luňák wrote: > > I suggest that we remove the '-arch:SSE' added on Windows, i.e. that we > > require at least SSE2-capable systems. > > No objections per se - just the question (mostly to have it documented > here): what woul

Re: Requiring SSE2 on Windows

On 05.05.20 15:48, Luboš Luňák wrote: Hello, I suggest that we remove the '-arch:SSE' added on Windows, i.e. that we require at least SSE2-capable systems. This was added by 8bd6bf93b7 in 2014, but at this point there's basically nobody who would be running LO but wouldn't be capable of

Re: Requiring SSE2 on Windows

Hi Luboš, Luboš Luňák wrote: > I suggest that we remove the '-arch:SSE' added on Windows, i.e. that we > require at least SSE2-capable systems. > No objections per se - just the question (mostly to have it documented here): what would we gain? Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description:

Re: Requiring SSE2 on Windows

On Tuesday 05 of May 2020, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > (FWIW, when -msse2 was discussed for 32-bit Linux x86 in the context of > tml> "Re: Test File: sc/qa/unit/data/functions/fods/chiinv.fods: fails with > Assertion", it wa

Re: Requiring SSE2 on Windows

On 05/05/2020 15:48, Luboš Luňák wrote: I suggest that we remove the '-arch:SSE' added on Windows, i.e. that we require at least SSE2-capable systems. This was added by 8bd6bf93b7 in 2014, but at this point there's basically nobody who would be running LO but wouldn't be capable of SSE2.