On 05/07/12 16:09, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 07/05/2012 04:22 AM, Noel Power wrote:
On 05/07/12 02:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
The behavior change scares me a bit. I seem to remember some time
back that there was a reason for this behavior, but I was given that
information many
On 07/05/2012 04:22 AM, Noel Power wrote:
On 05/07/12 02:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 07/04/2012 03:23 PM, Noel Power wrote:
with
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=1720641bf36306fc296635925e571556ced8a302
a long standing wrinkle with modifying nested structs in
Hey,
>>
>> On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 20:23 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
>>>
>>> before this change the following macro snippet would not work.
>>
>> It would be -wonderful- to start some basic / UNO unit tests right
>> here
>
> I already signalled my intention in the previous mail
>>
>> [*] have t
On 05/07/12 11:49, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Noel,
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 20:23 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
before this change the following macro snippet would not work.
It would be -wonderful- to start some basic / UNO unit tests right here
I already signalled my intention in the previous
Hi Noel,
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 20:23 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> before this change the following macro snippet would not work.
It would be -wonderful- to start some basic / UNO unit tests right here
- are there really no unit tests for (what should be) something
eminently unit-test-able ?
On 05/07/12 02:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 07/04/2012 03:23 PM, Noel Power wrote:
with
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=1720641bf36306fc296635925e571556ced8a302
a long standing wrinkle with modifying nested structs in basic should
be eliminated
[ blah blah b
On 07/04/2012 03:23 PM, Noel Power wrote:
with
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=1720641bf36306fc296635925e571556ced8a302
a long standing wrinkle with modifying nested structs in basic should
be eliminated
before this change the following macro snippet would not work.
