On 10/26/2015 06:14 PM, Ashod Nakashian wrote:
As a transitional phase, we can maintain the same interface but with
std:atomic as the implementation.
osl/interlck.h is part of the stable URE interface. While the
osl_atomic_inc-/decrement macros are marked as INTERNAL and should
arguably not
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Ashod Nakashian wrote:
> Not sure which horror you are referring to (surely you meant 'our', for the
> collective codebase).
Yes, I meant 'our', sorry.
>
> on Windows and if it improves things in the profiler, I'll submit a patch
> for consideration.
> I think it
Thanks Norbert for the detailed reply. Some comments below.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Ashod Nakashian
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Norbert Thiebaud
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Ashod Nak
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Ashod Nakashian wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Norbert Thiebaud
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Ashod Nakashian
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Norbert Thiebaud
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:14 PM,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Ashod Nakashian
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Norbert Thiebaud
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ashod Nakashian
> >> wrote:
> >> > OSL provides atomic helpers (osl_
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Ashod Nakashian wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Norbert Thiebaud
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ashod Nakashian
>> wrote:
>> > OSL provides atomic helpers (osl_atomic_xxx) in the form of a GNU
>> > builtin
>> > (where available) or a p
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ashod Nakashian
> wrote:
> > OSL provides atomic helpers (osl_atomic_xxx) in the form of a GNU builtin
> > (where available) or a platform-specific implementation.
> >
> > Any reason for not using modern
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ashod Nakashian wrote:
> OSL provides atomic helpers (osl_atomic_xxx) in the form of a GNU builtin
> (where available) or a platform-specific implementation.
>
> Any reason for not using modern std::atomic (besides possible lack of
> volunteers) ?
>
>
> As a trans
