Re: Liberation Fonts updated to 2.0

2012-08-20 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 13:02 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 11:08 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > I don't think there are any risks, now that there's been a little burn > > in time on master to test that there's no build/install cockups. > > Great; so a +1 from me for

Re: Liberation Fonts updated to 2.0

2012-08-17 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 11:08 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > I don't think there are any risks, now that there's been a little burn > in time on master to test that there's no build/install cockups. Great; so a +1 from me for -3-6 then :-) Thanks, Michael. -- m

Re: Liberation Fonts updated to 2.0

2012-08-17 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 11:01 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 09:24 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > I've updated our Liberation fonts to the new 2.0 version. The 2.0 > > version are basically rebased on the Chromeos/Croscore fonts and are > > under the OFL instead of the GPL+exc

Re: Liberation Fonts updated to 2.0

2012-08-17 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 09:24 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > I've updated our Liberation fonts to the new 2.0 version. The 2.0 > version are basically rebased on the Chromeos/Croscore fonts and are > under the OFL instead of the GPL+exception license of the 1.X series. Thanks so much ! :-)