Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-12 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Keith, Keith Curtis píše v St 12. 03. 2014 v 13:44 -0400: > Who is going to do this? I've just pushed that as https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/8560 All the best, Kendy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.free

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-12 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Norbert, Norbert Thiebaud píše v Út 11. 03. 2014 v 19:29 -0500: > > then the simplest way > > disable these patches on the Mac is to just force mnDPIScaleFactor to 1. In > > that case, these patches would behave as it does on 4.2.1. > > yep, that does that indeed. > pushed > http://cgit.freed

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-11 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
for info here is teh different DPI reported by vcl for the same 13'' screen at different display setting n_th@Norberts-MacBook-Pro /lo/core$ ./instdir/LibreOfficeDev.app/Contents/MacOS/soffice 2014-03-11 19:39:44.065 soffice[270:507] final mnRealDPIX = 91 mnRealDPIY = 91 n_th@Norberts-MacBook-Pro

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-11 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Keith Curtis wrote: > then the simplest way > disable these patches on the Mac is to just force mnDPIScaleFactor to 1. In > that case, these patches would behave as it does on 4.2.1. yep, that does that indeed. pushed http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/c

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-11 Thread Keith Curtis
Well, the rabbit hole gets deeper. Norbert, it now seems to me that there isn't something wrong with your build, but with your OS!?! Here is a screenshot of the current released build on Retina for comparison:

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-11 Thread Keith Curtis
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Keith Curtis wrote: >> >> That picture is bizarre in that the gridlines drawn by Calc are not being >> doubled. Have you fiddled with the OS DPI stuff? > > > The grid lines are not bitmap, they are vec

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-11 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Keith Curtis wrote: > That picture is bizarre in that the gridlines drawn by Calc are not being > doubled. Have you fiddled with the OS DPI stuff? > The grid lines are not bitmap, they are vector drawing... but more importantly... _WITH_ the #ifdef to prevent th

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-11 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:33:13AM +0100, Stefan Knorr wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > On 10/03/14 22:51, Keith Curtis wrote: > > Doubling bitmaps is a "hack" but since bigger bitmaps don't exist, it > > is better than doing nothing. I haven't looked into

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-11 Thread Stefan Knorr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, On 10/03/14 22:51, Keith Curtis wrote: > Doubling bitmaps is a "hack" but since bigger bitmaps don't exist, it > is better than doing nothing. I haven't looked into the low-level > resource loading code, but there are very probably VCL changes

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-10 Thread Keith Curtis
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Keith Curtis wrote: >> Doubling bitmaps is a "hack" but since bigger bitmaps don't exist, it >> is better than doing nothing. > > The problem is that mac, in compatibility mode, already auto-double.. > so

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Keith Curtis wrote: > Doubling bitmaps is a "hack" but since bigger bitmaps don't exist, it > is better than doing nothing. The problem is that mac, in compatibility mode, already auto-double.. so we end-up with a quadrupling of the bitmap, which mean you in the e

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-10 Thread Keith Curtis
Perhaps it would be good to have Norbert double-check his work, but it seems logical the later changes aren't necessary without his first retina change to turn off auto-doubling mode, which is not a part of this set. Norbert is still in the investigation phase, and there are multiple ways to imple

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > Norbert Thiebaud píše v Po 10. 03. 2014 v 14:11 -0500: > >> > It is only 5 patches, as I have squashed the follow-up fixes into the >> > appropriate patches, but other than that, it should bring us to the very >> > same state

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-10 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Norbert, Norbert Thiebaud píše v Po 10. 03. 2014 v 14:11 -0500: > > It is only 5 patches, as I have squashed the follow-up fixes into the > > appropriate patches, but other than that, it should bring us to the very > > same state that is in master. > > Not quite.. I had to add a bunch of #ifn

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: >> Hi Caolán, all, >> > >> >> It is only 5 patches, as I have squashed the follow-up fixes into the >> appropriate patches, but other than that, it should bring us to the very >> same

Re: Hi-DPI patches for 4.2

2014-03-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi Caolán, all, > > > It is only 5 patches, as I have squashed the follow-up fixes into the > appropriate patches, but other than that, it should bring us to the very > same state that is in master. Not quite.. I had to add a bunch of #ifn