Re: Good way of submitting patches

2012-08-17 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 02:22:46PM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > no need to use some other SW for sending mail, the > gerrit itself can send good mails without 3rd party processing, from > what I have seen there. Well, with gerrit you are somewhat limited to its default usecases (apart from the m

Re: Good way of submitting patches

2012-08-17 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Bjoern, Bjoern Michaelsen píše v Pá 17. 08. 2012 v 11:55 +0200: > https://github.com/openstack-ci/gerritbot > > is now properly licensed and making it send mails instead IRCing should be > rather easy. Are you volunteering? ;) Yes, I volunteered quite some time ago already when I wanted the

Re: Good way of submitting patches

2012-08-17 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Kendy, On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:03:40AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > didn't I submit a patch for them to at least include the patch itself some > time ago? yes. >Or did it not do what it was supposed to be doing? It did not. :( However: https://github.com/openstack-ci/gerritbot is n

Re: Good way of submitting patches

2012-08-17 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Jean-Tiare, Bjoern Michaelsen píše v Pá 10. 08. 2012 v 16:52 +0200: > > What is the good way of submitting contributions ? It seems that > > sending the raw patch on the list leads to a faster a > > review/integration but the recommended way is still gerrit ? > > Some of the grumpy old hacker

Re: Good way of submitting patches

2012-08-10 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:32:50PM +0200, Jean-Tiare LE BIGOT wrote: > What is the good way of submitting contributions ? It seems that > sending the raw patch on the list leads to a faster a > review/integration but the recommended way is still gerrit ? Some of the grumpy old hacker only start to