Hi,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 01:33:36PM +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> I think attempting to export from LibreOffice is really pointless.
I would not be too sure of that. For the audience of this list: absolutely. For
the
users of our product: unlikely. RST, MarkDown, MediaWiki are transparent
Hi *,
Am 27.11.2014 00:29 schrieb "Bjoern Michaelsen" <
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com>:
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:16:14AM +
> Personally MarkDown seems fine to me and we are actually already using it
> elsewhere in the project (e.g. Infra docs, Redmine) IIRC.
For infra-internal docs we use
Hi *,
Am 26.11.2014 23:53 schrieb "Kohei Yoshida" :
> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:17 +1100, Chris Sherlock wrote:
>
> >
> > Also, what would the feasibility of using Markdown syntax, ala
> > github.io?
>
> Actually this may be an interesting choice for us in the long run.
> Markdown[1] seems to be po
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> If one of our wonderful Document Liberation guys would volunteer to mentor
> that, we could have an Easy Hack making LibreOffice exporting/importing
> MarkDown would be awesome ...
>
FWIW, there's
- pandoc for conversion to odt:
http://johnmacfarlane.net/BayHac2014
On 26/11/2014 23:16, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I wonder if it is politically controversial to be seen as "supporting"
a markup language, though, the antithesis to WYSIWYG... Even if it is
a quite new and minimal markup language, that doesn't pretend to be
even close to full-featured (like troff or T
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:16:14AM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> I wonder if it is politically controversial to be seen as "supporting" a
> markup language, though, the antithesis to WYSIWYG... Even if it is a quite
> new and minimal markup language, that doesn't pretend to be even close to
>
I wonder if it is politically controversial to be seen as "supporting" a
markup language, though, the antithesis to WYSIWYG... Even if it is a quite
new and minimal markup language, that doesn't pretend to be even close to
full-featured (like troff or TeX).
I can imagine the reaction among the tro
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:17 +1100, Chris Sherlock wrote:
>
> Also, what would the feasibility of using Markdown syntax, ala
> github.io?
Actually this may be an interesting choice for us in the long run.
Markdown[1] seems to be popular syntax of choice for README files in
many open source projec
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 01:17:07PM +1100, Chris Sherlock
wrote:
> I noticed that there is some minor formatting capabilities on the
> docs.libreoffice.org website for readmes.
>
> e.g. http://docs.libreoffice.org/vcl.html shows headings, which uses
> Wikimedia style double-equals sign
