Christian Lohmaier googlemail.com> writes:
>
> Hi Alfreen, *,
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Afreen Bano
gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > After runnning the command "/opt/lo/bin/make" I got the below error:
> >
> > "make[1]:INTERNAL: Exiting with 1jobserver token available should be 2!
> > mak
Hi Alfreen, *,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Afreen Bano wrote:
>
> After runnning the command "/opt/lo/bin/make" I got the below error:
>
> "make[1]:INTERNAL: Exiting with 1jobserver token available should be 2!
> make:***[build] Error2"
> [...]
> Please anyone tell me what should I do to bu
Hello,
I am trying to build Libreoffice on windows7 (32bit), for this I referred to
the below link:
"https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Windows_Build_Dependencies";
I installed Visual studio 2012 along with Cygwin version 4.
After runnning the command "/opt/lo/bin/make" I got the
We have 233000 lines of makefile code using a mix of dmake and gmake.
Good luck converting that to cmake.
On 2012-02-20 09:52, Josh Heidenreich wrote:
Hi,
Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created
c
On February 17, 2012 at 11:22 AM Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > Projects like this have to
> > battle the "embrace, extend, extinguish" philosophy of commercial
interests.
>
> What makes you think only commercial entities have that philosophy? As
> far as I know Linux, also embraces and extends POSI
> Not the last time I benchmarked it (which was long before
> filter-showIncludes.pl). For the most part the slowness of forking on windows
> was related to some latency, i.e. a new process would take some time to get
> started, but it wouldnt eat cycles for that, thus making it irrelevant in a
> p
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 05:42:11PM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> And the slowness of Cygwin's forking and executing the various Perl,
> shell and whatnot processes involved in each file being compiled (note
> the pipe to filter-showIncludes.pl) has nothing to do with it?
Not the last time I
> Did you go with cmake, a cmake-style solution (something which
> converted makefiles to VS projects) or manually maintained them?
Manually maintained.
I started using cmake but it had to be discarded for some reason.
Unfortunately I don't remember why, but it was a long time ago so it
may not be
> In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the cpu
> power.
You said you see max 13% CPU usage by each cl.exe process on a
four-core, hyperthreading machine (i.e. 8-processor from Windows's
point of view)?
What is 100 divided by 8?
--tml
> I think that is oversimplifying things quite a bit.
Well, what isn't? Excuse me for writing quick emails without spending
a week researching first.
> While there are some
> stability issues with cygwin
"some" stability issues?
> when combined with evil Windows necessities like
> in-memory-vir
> I have noted that on my machine the cl.exe process is unable to push a cpu
> core to the limit.
My experience is the opposite; I occasionally see a cl.exe taking over
25% CPU on a four-core system (not HT)... Might of course just be
rounding errors; in any case for compilations taking a long tim
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:06:37PM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> The main problem in building LibreOffice for Windows on Windows
> currently is that the *open source* stuff used in the build, i.e.
> Cygwin, is slow and causes random errors. The Microsoft compiler and
> linker work fine. If the
Hi Jesus, Tor, *,
> It can be done, yes. But it requires several months of work from
> someone who knows what is doing and the result would probably be a
> nightmare to maintain.
Did you go with cmake, a cmake-style solution (something which
converted makefiles to VS projects) or manually maintai
> Speaking with Italo Vignoli (The Document Foundation) I understood that the
> goal was to use only open source tools so you do not have to depend in any
> way by the owners tools, such as Microsoft.
Bah. I don't agree with that.
After all, we are talking about building software to run on a
Mi
> AFAIK that was a pure community effort and not backed by Sun/Oracle.
I meant that Sun/Oracle was behind OpenOffice.org.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> OpenOffice.org, at least back when Sun/Oracle still was behind it, had
> a few (?) people working on using MinGW on Windows. We are not
> interested in that. Correspondingly they had not worked on
> cross-compilation (to any platform)
> But .. isn't there a project that involves the complete replacement of the
> MS compiler?
Yes. But that is not used *on* Windows. The subject of this thread is
"Building LibreOffice *on* Windows".
MinGW (the commonly used name for the GNU compiler and tool-chain when
targeting Windows) is supp
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:44:50AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 18:22 +1030, Josh Heidenreich wrote:
> > Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
> > solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created
> > cmake style perhaps?
>
> Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
> solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created cmake
> style perhaps?
5 years ago I did that for a non trivial Open Source project (it
included gtk, python, gstreamer, etc.).
I would say it was more or les
> Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
> solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide?
In theory it should be fairly trivial to create a "native" (whatever
that means) VS solution that just runs the same Cygwin make that you
would start manually otherwise.
But I gu
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 18:22 +1030, Josh Heidenreich wrote:
> Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
> solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created
> cmake style perhaps?
Ruins ? :-) I suspect that, unless this can be compiled from the
gn
Hi,
Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created cmake
style perhaps?
Josh
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:14:28AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > If at all possible, rather run Ubuntu (or some other Linux distro)
> > inside a VMWare virtual machine on your Windows desktop.
>
> Don't forget openSUSE and Fedora. We have quite a number of core
> developers from both of th
>> > Projects like this have to battle the "embrace, extend, extinguish"
>> > philosophy of commercial
>> > interests.
>> What makes you think only commercial entities have that philosophy?
> What makes you think I thought that?
I misunderstood your use of "battle". I thought you meant that onl
> Projects like this have to
> battle the "embrace, extend, extinguish" philosophy of commercial interests.
What makes you think only commercial entities have that philosophy? As
far as I know Linux, also embraces and extends POSIX, for instance,
and has more or less managed to extinguish quite ma
On February 16, 2012 at 11:23 AM "Jesús Corrius"
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> > If at all possible, rather run Ubuntu (or some other Linux distro)
inside a
> > VMWare virtual machine on your Windows desktop.
>
> We should encourage Windows developers to join the project to have a
> better Windows ver
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 17:19 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> well, nobody builds on Windows. because the Windows build is very often
> broken. which is because nobody builds on Windows.
I build it on occasion, a master from a day or two ago built fine with
express 2008
C.
Hi Gareth,
Tor Lillqvist píše v Čt 16. 02. 2012 v 17:13 +0200:
> This is a short summary, and I might be missing something. For more
> detail, there should be stuff in the wiki. Don't hesitate to ask more
> on this list! And as you read the wiki, please fix inconsistencies you
> notice, that is w
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 20:34 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > That would be great but I don't think it would be very legal to distribute
> > it :)
>
> Not to the general public, but surely to specfic customers that can
> prove they have the required licenses themselves already? But IANAL...
> That would be great but I don't think it would be very legal to distribute it
> :)
Not to the general public, but surely to specfic customers that can
prove they have the required licenses themselves already? But IANAL...
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailin
Hi Tor,
>
> Or you could contract out the effort of setting up a working build
> environment on a machine... For instance provide a Windows virtual
> machine image with everything set up.
That would be great but I don't think it would be very legal to distribute it :)
--
Jesús Corrius
> I am a windows developer and I need to integrate LibreOffice in our windows
> business application.
In other words, you are doing this commercially, as part of your job,
for business purposes?
> I would have a hard time switching to develop using Linux.
We don't have any immediate plans to dro
> It would be interesting that a core developer uses Cygwin :)
The build on Windows using cygwin is more complicated than on Linux.
But once you have the beast built, the development should be exactly the same.
--
Jesús Corrius
___
LibreOffice mailing
> But the real problem is that if the community does not want or can not
> support then development on the windows platform is good for me to say this
> very clearly.
> I can not go and play around and waste time in this way.
What do you mean by supported?
--
Jesús Corrius
_
Hi guys,
> If at all possible, rather run Ubuntu (or some other Linux distro) inside a
> VMWare virtual machine on your Windows desktop.
We should encourage Windows developers to join the project to have a
better Windows version.
Telling them to use Linux will not improve the situation.
--
Jesú
On 16/02/12 16:17, Noel Grandin wrote:
> Hi
>
> If at all possible, rather run Ubuntu (or some other Linux distro)
> inside a VMWare virtual machine on your Windows desktop.
>
> It's much easier, speaking as someone who does just that, after spending
> too long fighting with building under Window
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 17:17 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> Hi
>
> If at all possible, rather run Ubuntu (or some other Linux distro)
> inside a VMWare virtual machine on your Windows desktop.
Don't forget openSUSE and Fedora. We have quite a number of core
developers from both of these distros, so
Hi
If at all possible, rather run Ubuntu (or some other Linux distro)
inside a VMWare virtual machine on your Windows desktop.
It's much easier, speaking as someone who does just that, after spending
too long fighting with building under Windows.
Regards, Noel.
On 2012-02-16 16:54, Gareth
> New to open source and attracted to LibreOffice and I want to start
> contributing.
Great! Welcome!
> But how does the whole build process work on Windows?
This is a short summary, and I might be missing something. For more
detail, there should be stuff in the wiki. Don't hesitate to ask more
39 matches
Mail list logo
