Re: About "-std=c++98" by default in CXXFLAGS

2013-02-21 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 14:00 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > It is intentional that some C++11 features are used if available, in order > to > provide various benefits (SAL_OVERRIDE for example). FWIW, another gotcha with --with-system-boost and at least some recent versions of boost is that our use

Re: About "-std=c++98" by default in CXXFLAGS

2013-02-21 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Thursday 21 of February 2013, julien2412 wrote: > Hello, > > Since all compilers aren't ready for C++11, would it be relevant to include > by default "-std=c++98" in CXXFLAGS ? > The goal is, for beginners like me, to avoid submitting things like > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2302 :-) It is

Re: About "-std=c++98" by default in CXXFLAGS

2013-02-21 Thread Gábor Stefanik
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:13 PM, julien2412 wrote: > Hello, > > Since all compilers aren't ready for C++11, would it be relevant to include > by default "-std=c++98" in CXXFLAGS ? > The goal is, for beginners like me, to avoid submitting things like > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2302 :-) > > Ju