I would suggest to concentrate on the requested benefit for LibreOffice users
first and why this measure is being proposed to train some perspective.
In your example you propose by some percentage will inadvertently select to opt
in to the anonymous non mandatory data collection. And some amount
On 14/07/2022 0:44, John Mills wrote:
Do you consider people manipulated by asking them an unambiguous
question that would default to no?
"Would you like to place a bet of 100 EUR on a die roll, winning an
extra 100 on a 6 and losing otherwise? [N/Y]: N_
Suppose I ask a million people this que
I just don't follow this logic at all.
'
+ probably a question "Do you want to share data..." as opt-in
+ That's manipulative and inappropriate:
1. Many people just click "yes yes yes" to get through
installations, assuming it's all benign.
2. People will be presented an imb
There are a more concerns, and questions, and potential answers to
questions. These include additions I've made after the session
concluded, based partially on my points in the chat, and as suggested I
do by Heiko. For now I'll just add the Questions section after my additions.
Questions
+ W
