On 16/04/13 15:04, Robinson Tryon wrote:
>> > If they wanted to work on them, they would work on
>> > them independently on the voting results.
>> >
> Hmm... I imagine that some of the volunteers might like a little
> guidance as to what bugs/issues are most affecting our users right
> now?
>
Or,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> I am afraid that this could not work easily. If we do the work and
> select 10-15 nice features and find potential volunteers, we probably do
> not need voting. There will be most likely different volunteers for the
> different features.
ok, i
Joel Madero píše v Po 15. 04. 2013 v 11:20 -0700:
>
>
> Also we don't need a new system for the voting, we already
> have the bugzilla.
>
>
> Currently we don't use bugzilla voting, also it is a big problem if
> the #1 enhancement request is some crazy request that takes
>
> Also we don't need a new system for the voting, we already have the
> bugzilla.
>
Currently we don't use bugzilla voting, also it is a big problem if the #1
enhancement request is some crazy request that takes 1000 hours to
implement. The idea is that we limit the poll to enhancements we KNOW
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen <
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 08:18:17PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
> > We select 10-15 possible enhancements that can be completed in a
> > reasonably short period of time (within a minor release). We
