On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 09:23:53AM +0100, Samuel Mehrbrodt wrote:
>I don't care much which of the jars contains the actual class files, as
>long as we don't break backwards compatibility.
I agree.
>But I would support adding an additional "uno.jar" (or "libreoffice.jar"),
>which h
Hi,
I don't care much which of the jars contains the actual class files, as
long as we don't break backwards compatibility.
But I would support adding an additional "uno.jar" (or
"libreoffice.jar"), which has ridl.jar, unoloader.jar, juh.jar etc on
it's classpath.
So that as an extension d
