On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 08:54 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> On 2020/04/24 11:44 am, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > I guess we'll need to look for a better approach to get rid of
> > those annoying Coverity "uncaught exception" warnings (of
> > the category, "mechanical static analysis may conclude that
On 2020/04/24 11:44 am, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
I guess we'll need to look for a better approach to get rid of those annoying Coverity "uncaught exception" warnings (of
the category, "mechanical static analysis may conclude that this can happen, but human analysis concludes that this
cannot ha
I guess we'll need to look for a better approach to get rid of those
annoying Coverity "uncaught exception" warnings (of the category,
"mechanical static analysis may conclude that this can happen, but human
analysis concludes that this cannot happen; and if it did, we are
screwed anyway"---i.e
