Hi,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Tomas Chvatal wrote:
>> Anyhow, currently for SUSE/openSUSE needs we are content with 2.7/3.4+
>>
> Then again, our release builders (CentOS6) are still on 2.6 by default
> - or do we use internal python there?
Yes to both.
it is on
On 05.03.2018 13:13, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Tomas Chvatal wrote:
>> Anyhow, currently for SUSE/openSUSE needs we are content with 2.7/3.4+
>>
> Then again, our release builders (CentOS6) are still on 2.6 by default
> - or do we use internal python there?
we could easily switch to --enable-pytho
Tomas Chvatal wrote:
> Anyhow, currently for SUSE/openSUSE needs we are content with 2.7/3.4+
>
Then again, our release builders (CentOS6) are still on 2.6 by default
- or do we use internal python there?
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Heya,
sorry for late reply, we had conference over a weekend and they blocked
all smtp ports...
Anyhow, currently for SUSE/openSUSE needs we are content with 2.7/3.4+
Actually even 3.4+ is acceptable for us.
Cheers
Tom
Michael Stahl píše v So 03. 03. 2018 v 19:50 +0100:
> hi Tomáš,
>
> is Py
hi Tomáš,
is Python 2.6 support still needed for master / 6.1 ?
i'd like to bump the requirement to 2.7 if possible, it's really painful
having to bother with 2.6 in this day and age...
On 02.03.2018 22:54, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:
>> commit 44b4
Hello,
Thorsten Behrens, on ven. 02 mars 2018 22:54:40 +0100, wrote:
> libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:
> > commit 44b4ad7d210097fdaed7dd94c5746b03f43592d3
> > Author: Thorsten Behrens
> > Date: Fri Mar 2 22:38:18 2018 +0100
> >
> > build fix: disable gla11y for python 2.6
>
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:
> commit 44b4ad7d210097fdaed7dd94c5746b03f43592d3
> Author: Thorsten Behrens
> Date: Fri Mar 2 22:38:18 2018 +0100
>
> build fix: disable gla11y for python 2.6
>
Some tinderboxen failing with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tinderb
On 22.02.2018 13:54, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Miklos Vajna, on jeu. 22 févr. 2018 09:53:43 +0100, wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:11:18AM +0100, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
Rene Engelhard, on mer. 21 févr. 2018 10:02:08 +0100, wrote:
OK, thanks - and then I wonder why this is ran in "normal" UICo
Hello,
Miklos Vajna, on jeu. 22 févr. 2018 09:53:43 +0100, wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:11:18AM +0100, Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
> > Rene Engelhard, on mer. 21 févr. 2018 10:02:08 +0100, wrote:
> > > OK, thanks - and then I wonder why this is ran in "normal" UIConfig
> > > targets and
> >
Hi Samuel,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:11:18AM +0100, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> For the "error" cases (-W none), it makes sense:
>
> « Add to the build process error checking (only the hard errors such as
> bogus target names). »
>
> That's really the kind of issues one should get as soon as co
Rene Engelhard, on mer. 21 févr. 2018 10:02:08 +0100, wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:19:51AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Even if installing python-xml (for the actual script) and python3
> > > (for the configure check) it complains about no input files or somesuch
> > > and fails
>
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:19:51AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Even if installing python-xml (for the actual script) and python3
> > (for the configure check) it complains about no input files or somesuch
> > and fails
>
> Indeed, I sent a fix for that
>
> https://gerrit.libreoffic
Stephan Bergmann, on mer. 21 févr. 2018 09:26:03 +0100, wrote:
> Drop the shebang line and call it as `$(PYTHON) $(SRCDIR)/bin/gla11y` from
> the makefile?
It's still be useful to keep the shebang for people to be also able to
run it directly as shell command, but we can force the python shell fro
On 21.02.2018 09:19, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Rene Engelhard, on mer. 21 févr. 2018 09:11:02 +0100, wrote:
diff --git a/bin/gla11y b/bin/gla11y
new file mode 100755
index ..d0619133ad0f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/bin/gla11y
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
That's "python". Python2.
Hello,
Rene Engelhard, on mer. 21 févr. 2018 09:11:02 +0100, wrote:
> Was this ever really tested besides Jenkins (no idea with what build
> config this was tested...)?
I did test it, but apparently not in all potential situations.
> > diff --git a/bin/gla11y b/bin/gla11y
> > new file mode 10075
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 09:22:10PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> New commits:
> commit 226697ae27ef451cad404256e83eef88262f16d1
> Author: Samuel Thibault
> Date: Fri Feb 16 13:22:10 2018 +0100
>
> Integrate initial version of gla11y tool in the build system
>
> This is part
16 matches
Mail list logo
