Re: [Libreoffice] python / XInvocation snafu ...

2011-05-27 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Thu, 26 May 2011 11:57:35 +0200 Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > @Xisco: Could you try to change the wizards-code to use the new > service instead on the branch and self-assign Bug 37290 to yourself > for that (I could not find you on bugzilla)? Then we could merge this > change back to master. Alr

Re: [Libreoffice] python / XInvocation snafu ...

2011-05-26 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:14:31 +0100 Michael Meeks wrote: > Oh ! as in add a new one, and kill the old one off: I > guess ... the question is, will we remember to remove the old code if > we don't kill it day #1 ? :-) [ I think not ]. It'd be great to > rip/replace now. It seems we o

Re: [Libreoffice] python / XInvocation snafu ...

2011-05-23 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 10:18 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > I have taken a look at the class and all it does is provide > string resources via the good ol' tools ressource manager. Beautiful :-) I suspect (hope) that this impl. behavioural detail can be tweaked, and that only the wizar

Re: [Libreoffice] python / XInvocation snafu ...

2011-05-23 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Michael, Hi Xisco, all, On Thu, 19 May 2011 15:05:26 +0100 Michael Meeks wrote: > So - if we want to use this class from Python, we need to > work out: > > a) what the heck is going on in that resource.cxx class :-) > + why is it implementing XInvocation - there see