Re: [Libreoffice] postgresql bits in minutes of tech. steering call

2012-02-03 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:37:38PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:14:42PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > > > a more accurate statement would be, we only use libraries that are in a > > sufficiently recent version in our baseline system, and which are > > available in

Re: [Libreoffice] postgresql bits in minutes of tech. steering call

2012-02-02 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:14:42PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 15/12/11 19:46, Michael Meeks wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 19:11 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >>> On this, someone said on the talk "we use only libc" (and I implicitly >>> understood: in the binaries we distribute). >>

Re: [Libreoffice] postgresql bits in minutes of tech. steering call

2011-12-16 Thread Michael Stahl
On 15/12/11 19:46, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 19:11 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> On this, someone said on the talk "we use only libc" (and I implicitly >> understood: in the binaries we distribute). > > You have to be quite careful with claims from Fridrich, they are

Re: [Libreoffice] postgresql bits in minutes of tech. steering call

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 19:11 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On this, someone said on the talk "we use only libc" (and I implicitly > understood: in the binaries we distribute). You have to be quite careful with claims from Fridrich, they are often exaggerated for comic effect :-)