Re: [Libreoffice] SolidMarkHandles - [PATCH] removed Simple Handles option entries from help

I have removed both my gmail, and this e-mail from this list, why am i still receiving e-mails? > On 11/10/2011 05:10 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: >>> I miss changes in the help files >> Right ! any chance you can dig into that Tim ? (wow you'll have seen >> ~all of the suite after this task ;-).

Re: [Libreoffice] SolidMarkHandles - [PATCH] removed Simple Handles option entries from help

On 11/10/2011 05:10 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: >> I miss changes in the help files > Right ! any chance you can dig into that Tim ? (wow you'll have seen > ~all of the suite after this task ;-). Sure, I think this should be it. Tim -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild,

Re: [Libreoffice] SolidMarkHandles

Hi Regina, On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 15:27 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote: > Your explanations convinced me. Good :-) > That would mean, that the UI in the > other modules is changed too ? If yes, it needs a description in > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.5 that highlight

Re: [Libreoffice] SolidMarkHandles

Hi Michael, Michael Meeks schrieb: Hi Regina, On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 11:18 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote: I do not understand, why SolidMarkHandles should be removed. It works as it should. Heh :-) If it is set to TRUE, you get the 3D-Handles, and if it is set to FALSE, you get the f

Re: [Libreoffice] SolidMarkHandles

Hi Regina, On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 11:18 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote: > I do not understand, why SolidMarkHandles should be removed. It works as > it should. Heh :-) > If it is set to TRUE, you get the 3D-Handles, and if it is > set to FALSE, you get the flat handles. It is the same set

Re: [Libreoffice] SolidMarkHandles

Hi, Stephan Bergmann schrieb: On 11/08/2011 10:29 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Given that SolidMarkHandles is listed in com.sun.star.text.ViewSettings, it is unclear to me whether it should indeed be removed? From private replies I received, I gather that the above was probably not phrased cl

Re: [Libreoffice] SolidMarkHandles

On 11/08/2011 10:29 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Given that SolidMarkHandles is listed in com.sun.star.text.ViewSettings, it is unclear to me whether it should indeed be removed? From private replies I received, I gather that the above was probably not phrased clearly enough to get my point acr

Re: [Libreoffice] SolidMarkHandles - [PATCH] removed leftovers of the Simple Handles option

Hi, I have created a patch to remove the leftovers mentioned here and some additional I have found. Tim On 11/08/2011 10:29 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Hi all, > > Looks like > > "removed Simple