Re: [Libreoffice] QA session at LibreOffice conference

2011-10-17 Thread Cor Nouws
Cor Nouws wrote (10-10-11 23:12) I'll prepare myself for at least a good introduction on the topic for the session. So .. well .. due to the short time for preparation that I had, and the interesting presentations at the conference, that made it hard for me too concentrate on preparing my ow

Re: [Libreoffice] QA session at LibreOffice conference

2011-10-11 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Rainer, Rainer Bielefeld wrote (11-10-11 06:36) I will no be there and am not involved into any preparations, so I do not know what we are talking about. Unfortunately this and next week my job only will leave few time for LibO activity. Sorry to hear that you'll not be there. I just was l

Re: [Libreoffice] QA session at LibreOffice conference

2011-10-10 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Hi, I will no be there and am not involved into any preparations, so I do not know what we are talking about. Unfortunately this and next week my job only will leave few time for LibO activity. [...] And usually it also are ad hoc contributions that I make. As we all - more or less, and I

Re: [Libreoffice] QA session at LibreOffice conference

2011-10-10 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Michael, Michael Meeks wrote (10-10-11 22:15) Looks like you're in charge :-) and/or you had a great list of questions. :-) This is your chance to discuss this, you've been concerned about it for a while, and we havn't managed to get to it. I'd really like to understand y

Re: [Libreoffice] QA session at LibreOffice conference

2011-10-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Cor, On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 17:44 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: > Doing some preparations for Paris, I see there is a discrepancy between > the program on the website and the one in the spreadsheet, that can be > downloaded. Yes - the spreadsheet is more authoritative, Charles has a yet mor