Re: LibreOffice: license statement ...

2012-05-16 Thread Andrew West
All of my past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be licensed under the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license. Andrew West (BabelStone) On 15 May 2012 12:32, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Andrew, > >        I'm just working through the MPL/LGPLv3+ re-licensing audit at > the moment (so we can include cod

[ADDED] Re: [libreoffice] license statement

2012-05-03 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Marco, Marco Cecchetti píše v Čt 03. 05. 2012 v 21:35 +0200: > All of my past and future contributions to LibreOffice may be > licensed under the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license. Thank you, added you to the list :-) Regards, Kendy ___ LibreOffice mailing

Re: LibreOffice / license ...

2012-03-15 Thread Volker Quetschke
LibreOffice project: All of my past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be licensed under the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license, including the go-oo code. Regards, Volker Quetschke -- == Dr. Volker M. Quetschke 4534 Lakeway Dr. B

Re: [Libreoffice] License

2011-12-05 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:15:10 +0100 Italo Vignoli wrote: > This would be a good story for Mission Impossible 5... You can help me break the build system just before branch off. It is a sure way to make new friends. ;) Best, Bjoern -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen _

Re: [Libreoffice] License

2011-12-05 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 12/5/11 11:10 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Heh ! :-) I have high hopes for your code hacking ... :-) This would be a good story for Mission Impossible 5... In any case, it looks like there is enough work on the help files for my spare time. In eight years, I have never opened the help file

Re: [Libreoffice] License

2011-12-05 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 18:50 +0100, Italo Vignoli wrote: > All my patches are LGPLv3/MPL. Lovely :-) > For those worried by such a statement, I hereby promise that I will > focus on help files and will carefully avoid the real code. Heh ! :-) I have high hopes for your code hack

Re: [Libreoffice] License statement

2011-11-19 Thread Julien Chaffraix
> Did you mean LGPLv3/MPL ? Yes, that was a typo. Corrected line below: All current and past contributions made to the LibreOffice project are done under the LGPLv3 / MPL or later version of these licenses. Until further notice, all future contributions to the LibreOffice project are available un

Re: [Libreoffice] License statement

2011-11-18 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Julien Chaffraix wrote: > Hi fellow hackers, > > All current and past contributions made to the LibreOffice project are > done under the GPLv3 / MPL or later version of these licenses. Did you mean LGPLv3/MPL ? Norbert ___

Re: [Libreoffice] License for my patches

2011-09-21 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Samphan, On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 09:55 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Please don't forget to update And thanks for the clear statement :-) Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___

Re: [Libreoffice] License for my patches

2011-09-21 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 09/21/2011 09:37 AM, Samphan Raruenrom wrote: All my patches to LibreOffice project are under LGPLv3+/MPL1.1 dual license and future versions of the licenses. Please don't forget to update accordingly. -Stephan __

Re: [Libreoffice] License for my patches

2011-09-08 Thread Marc-André Laverdière
Thanks for pointing out to that wiki page. I had missed it too!!! -- Marc-André Laverdière Software Security Scientist Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services Hyderabad, India On Thu 08 Sep 2011 09:13:56 PM IST, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi, > > I want to add me to > http://wiki.documentfound

Re: [Libreoffice] License for my patch

2011-09-07 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Wolfgang, On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 14:58:50 +0200, Wolfgang Pechlaner wrote: > all my pathes are under LPGLv3+ and MPL 1.1. > free software for free people. Great :-) Thanks Eike -- PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication. Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60

Re: [Libreoffice] License confirmation

2011-08-28 Thread Henrik Jensen
>> - Original Message - >> From: Bjoern Michaelsen canonical.com> >> To: Henrik Jensen yahoo.dk> >> Cc: Henrik Jensen yahoo.dk>; "libreoffice -> >> lists.freedesktop.org" lists.freedesktop.org> >> Sent: Friday, 26 August 2011, 18:07 >> Subject: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Download and ins

Re: [Libreoffice] License confirmation

2011-08-26 Thread Henrik Jensen
> - Original Message - > From: Bjoern Michaelsen > To: Henrik Jensen > Cc: Henrik Jensen ; > "libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org" > Sent: Friday, 26 August 2011, 18:07 > Subject: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Download and install git plugin for jenkins > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:42:31 +0100

Re: [Libreoffice] License for patch submission (was: Re: [PATCH] Replace List with vector<> in svx)

2011-06-29 Thread Rafael Dominguez
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Thorsten Behrens < t...@documentfoundation.org> wrote: > Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > Thanks, pushed. Can you confirm that your patches are licensed > > under our common LGPL3+/MPL1.1 combination? > > > Hi Rafael, please confirm your submission is under our standard >

Re: [Libreoffice] License for patch submission (was: Re: [PATCH] Replace List with vector<> in svx)

2011-06-29 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Thanks, pushed. Can you confirm that your patches are licensed > under our common LGPL3+/MPL1.1 combination? > Hi Rafael, please confirm your submission is under our standard LGPL3+/MPL1.1 license. Going forward, others usually resorted to a "until further notice, all my cont