Michael Meeks wrote:
> We could do worse than cutting / pasting / editing point two of:
> http://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2011-02-04.html into the release
> notes (or something).
>
Added a short notice, and a link to that blog post. Let's work on a
more formal approach to this for the
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 08:22 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> yes, since we've merged all code from OOo 3.3.0 (with the exception
> of one rather broken calc fix).
..
> Well, we have. It's Cc-ed. What we prolly need is to properly
> document this.
We could do worse than cutting / pasting /
At 2:22am -0500 Tue, 08 Feb 2011, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Well, we have. It's Cc-ed. What we prolly need is to properly
document this.
No no! They're just practicing good security: obscurity! ;-)
Kevin
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists
Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
> 1. My apologies if this has been posted
>http://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html
>Did we get them fixed in 3.3.0?
>
Hi,
yes, since we've merged all code from OOo 3.3.0 (with the exception
of one rather broken calc fix).
> 2. IMO, we need a security team,
