2011/8/4 Tomáš Chvátal :
> Dne 3.8.2011 18:41, Norbert Thiebaud napsal(a):
>>
>> Ok so now I read the patch...
>>
>> Did it work for you ?
>>
>> 1/ it seems to me that it is missing a piece to put that HAVE_GCC_AVX
>> in Env.Host.sh (see set_soenv.in)
>> without that the second patch will never see
Dne 3.8.2011 18:41, Norbert Thiebaud napsal(a):
Ok so now I read the patch...
Did it work for you ?
1/ it seems to me that it is missing a piece to put that HAVE_GCC_AVX
in Env.Host.sh (see set_soenv.in)
without that the second patch will never see it
2/ the makefile patches in the second patc
Ok so now I read the patch...
Did it work for you ?
1/ it seems to me that it is missing a piece to put that HAVE_GCC_AVX
in Env.Host.sh (see set_soenv.in)
without that the second patch will never see it
2/ the makefile patches in the second patch are dmake makefile so the
syntax is more somethi
Dne 3.8.2011 17:43, Norbert Thiebaud napsal(a):
I haven't read the patch, but you should use HAVE_GCC_AVX to stay
similar to existing check like that.
Ok, that is easy, I renamed the variable :)
Tom
>From 6ac456072b160f2786840b878c136408bac2559a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Tom=C3
2011/8/3 Tomáš Chvátal :
> Dne 3.8.2011 13:27, Caolán McNamara napsal(a):
>>
>> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 12:11 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 12:47 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Attaching the updated patch that adds it only where it should really be
needed.
>>
Dne 3.8.2011 13:27, Caolán McNamara napsal(a):
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 12:11 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 12:47 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Attaching the updated patch that adds it only where it should really be
needed.
seems reasonable, pushed.
*bzzt*, x86_64 gcc 4.3.4 d
